Compare Mini Countryman F60 LCI vs Land Rover Range Rover Evoque (L538) vs Mini Paceman (R61)

Mini Countryman F60 LCI

Land Rover Range Rover Evoque (L538)

Mini Paceman (R61)

Mini Countryman F60 LCILand Rover Range Rover Evoque (L538)Mini Paceman (R61)
Variants
Cooper
Cooper ALL4 AT
Cooper AT
Cooper D 1.5
Cooper D 1.5 AT
Cooper D 2.0
Cooper D 2.0 ALL4 AT
Cooper D 2.0 AT
Cooper S
Cooper S ALL4 AT
Cooper S AT
Cooper SD ALL4 AT
Cooper SD AT
Cooper SE ALL4 AT
eD4
SD4 190PS AWD
SD4 190PS AWD AT
Si4 240PS AWD 6AT
Si4 240PS AWD 9AT
TD4 150PS
TD4 150PS AWD
TD4 150PS AWD
TD4 150PS AWD AT
TD4 150PS AWD AT
TD4 180PS AWD
TD4 180PS AWD AT
Cooper
Cooper ALL4
Cooper ALL4 AT
Cooper AT
Cooper D 1.6
Cooper D 1.6 ALL4
Cooper D 2.0 ALL4 AT
Cooper D 2.0 AT
Cooper S
Cooper S ALL4
Cooper S ALL4 AT
Cooper S AT
Cooper SD
Cooper SD ALL4
Cooper SD ALL4 AT
Cooper SD AT
JCW
JCW AT
JCW Euro6 AT

Reviews

Neofiliac score32%15%25%
Pros
  • Low fuel consumption
  • Decent handling
  • Limited offroad capabilities
  • Cute and iconic design
Cons
  • Poor performance
  • Only available with small engines
  • Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
  • Horrible styling
  • Crossover nonsense
  • Limited utility
  • No powerful engine options
  • Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
  • Horrible styling
  • Unreliable ZF 9HP transmission
  • No powerful engine options
  • Disastrous engine unreliability
  • Ugly black plastic everywhere
  • Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)
RemoveRemoveRemove
Add up to 3 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on a best effort basis. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac respects your privacy. We do not track your activity on this website.