Compare Toyota Highlander 4 (XU70) vs Toyota C-HR (AX10/AX50) vs Toyota Highlander 4 (XU70)

Toyota Highlander 4 (XU70)

Toyota C-HR (AX10/AX50)

Toyota Highlander 4 (XU70)

Toyota Highlander 4 (XU70)Toyota C-HR (AX10/AX50)Toyota Highlander 4 (XU70)
Variants
2.5 Hybrid
2.5 Hybrid AWD
3.5 AT
3.5 AWD AT
1.2
1.2 4WD CVT
1.2 CVT
1.8 Hybrid
2.0 AT
2.5 Hybrid
2.5 Hybrid AWD
3.5 AT
3.5 AWD AT

Reviews

Neofiliac score64%28%64%
Pros
  • Decent styling
  • Some offroad capabilities
  • High cargo capacity
  • Decent exterior styling
  • Low official fuel consumption (hybrid)
  • Small turning circle
  • Decent styling
  • Some offroad capabilities
  • High cargo capacity
Cons
  • Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
  • Underpowered
  • Slow and sluggish
  • Miserably low engine output
  • Just a clumsy hatchback
  • Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
  • Underpowered

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)
RemoveRemoveRemove
Add up to 3 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on a best effort basis. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac respects your privacy. We do not track your activity on this website.