Compare Audi A6 C8 vs Hyundai i30 III Fastback facelift vs Hyundai Elantra 6 AD

Variants
35 TDI
40 TDI
40 TDI quattro
45 TDI quattro
45 TFSI
45 TFSI quattro
45 TFSI ultra
45 TFSI ultra quattro
50 TDI quattro
50 TFSI e quattro
55 TFSI e quattro
55 TFSI quattro
1.0 T-GDi
1.0 T-GDi DCT
1.5 T-GDi
1.5 T-GDi DCT
1.6 CRDi 115
1.6 CRDi 115 DCT
1.6 CRDi 136
1.6 CRDi 136 DCT
i30 N Performance
i30 N Performance DCT
1.4 DCT
2.0 MT
2.0 AT

Capacity

Cargo Capacity
408 L / 14.4 cu-ft
Fuel Capacity
50.0 L / 13.2 gal
53.0 L / 14.0 gal
Passengers
5
5
5

Chassis

Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Disc, 345 mm
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Disc, 314 mm
Drum
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
Multi-link
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Multi-link
Multi-link
Torsion bar
Tire Size
235/35 R19 Y
195/65 R15
Turning Circle
11.7 m / 38.2 ft
10.6 m / 34.8 ft

Construction

Battery | Capacity
14.1 kWh (gross)
Body Style
4-door Sedan

Dimensions

Ground Clearance
135 mm / 5.3 in
Size | Height
1457 mm / 57.4 in
1435 mm / 56.5 in
Size | Length
4939 mm / 194.4 in
4455 mm / 175.4 in
4569 mm / 179.9 in
Size | Width
1886 mm / 74.3 in | 2110 mm / 83.1 in (mirror unfolded)
1795 mm / 70.7 in
1801 mm / 70.9 in
Track Width | Front
1630.0 mm / 64.2 in
1562.0 mm / 61.5 in
Track Width | Rear
1617.0 mm / 63.7 in
1572.0 mm / 61.9 in
Wheel Size
8.0J x 19
15 in
Wheelbase
2924 mm / 115.1 in
2650 mm / 104.3 in
2700 mm / 106.3 in

Performance

Braking | 100 km/h - 0
34.6 m / 113.5 ft
Coefficient Of Drag
0.27

Powertrain

Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Engine | Bore
86.0 mm / 3.4 in
Engine | Compression Ratio
9.5:1
Engine | Stroke
86.0 mm / 3.4 in
Transmission | Gears
7-speed / 8-speed
Transmission | Type
DCT / automatic

Production

Availability
2016 ~ 2019
Debut
2018 Geneva Motor Show
Made In
Germany, China, India

Reviews

Neofiliac score
66%
27%
16%
Pros
  • Good exterior styling
  • Good 0.26 drag coefficient
  • Low official fuel consumption
  • Good suspension setup
  • Decent drivetrain reliability
  • Good 0.27 drag coefficient
  • Improved drivetrain range
  • Better styling
Cons
  • Too many electronic gizmos
  • Reliability concerns
  • Only available with small engines
  • Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
  • Miserably low engine output
  • Only available with small engines
  • Budget suspension setup
  • No independent rear suspension

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.