HomeArticlesProductsKeywordsCompanies

Compare Audi A6 C8 vs Ford Mondeo 4 Liftback vs Ford Mondeo 4

Variants
35 TDI
40 TDI
40 TDI quattro
45 TDI quattro
45 TFSI
45 TFSI quattro
45 TFSI ultra
45 TFSI ultra quattro
50 TDI quattro
50 TFSI e quattro
55 TFSI e quattro
55 TFSI quattro
1.0 EcoBoost 125
1.5 EcoBoost 160
1.5 EcoBoost 160 AT
1.5D 120
1.6D 115
2.0 EcoBoost 203 AT
2.0 EcoBoost 240 AT
2.0D 150
2.0D 150 AWD
2.0D 150 AT
2.0D 180
2.0D 180 AT
2.0D 180 AWD AT
2.0D 210 AT
1.0T
1.5T
1.5T AT
1.5D
1.5D Econetic
1.6D
1.6D Econetic
2.0T 203hp AT
2.0T 240hp AT
Hybrid
2.0D 150hp
2.0D 150hp AWD
2.0D 150hp Econetic
2.0D 150hp AT
2.0D 180hp
2.0D 180hp Econetic
2.0D 180hp AT
2.0D 180hp AWD AT
2.0D 210hp AT

Capacity

Fuel Capacity
62.5 L / 16.5 gal
Passengers
5
5
5

Chassis

Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Disc
Disc
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
Multi-link
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Multi-link
Multi-link
Multi-link
Tire Size
215/60 R16, 235/50 R17, 235/45 R18, 235/40 R19
215/60 R16, 235/50 R17, 235/45 R18, 235/40 R19
Turning Circle
11.6 m / 38.0 ft
11.6 m / 38.0 ft

Construction

Battery | Capacity
14.1 kWh (gross)
1.4 kWh (gross)
Body Style
5-door Hatchback

Dimensions

Ground Clearance
128 mm / 5.0 in
128 mm / 5.0 in
Size | Height
1457 mm / 57.4 in
1482 mm / 58.3 in
Size | Length
4939 mm / 194.4 in
4871 mm / 191.8 in
Size | Width
1886 mm / 74.3 in | 2110 mm / 83.1 in (mirror unfolded)
Track Width | Front
1630.0 mm / 64.2 in
1599.0 mm / 63.0 in
1599.0 mm / 63.0 in
Track Width | Rear
1617.0 mm / 63.7 in
1595.0 mm / 62.8 in
1595.0 mm / 62.8 in
Wheel Size
6.5J x 16, 7.5J x 17, 8J x 18, 8J x 19
6.5J x 16, 7.5J x 17, 8J x 18, 8J x 19
Wheelbase
2924 mm / 115.1 in
2850 mm / 112.2 in
2850 mm / 112.2 in

Powertrain

Transmission | Gears
7-speed / 8-speed
6-speed
6-speed
Transmission | Type
DCT / automatic

Production

Debut
2018 Geneva Motor Show
Made In
Germany, China, India

Reviews

Neofiliac score
66%
38%
37%
Pros
  • Good exterior styling
  • Good 0.26 drag coefficient
  • Low official fuel consumption
  • Good suspension setup
  • Low fuel consumption
  • Good towing capacity
  • Down to very low 3.6L/100km fuel consumption
  • Good towing capacity
Cons
  • Too many electronic gizmos
  • Reliability concerns
  • Only available with small engines
  • Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
  • No powerful engine options
  • Only available with small engines
  • Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.