Compare Audi Q3 Sportback (F3) vs Mazda CX-9 II (TC) vs Mazda CX-9 (TB)

Audi Q3 Sportback (F3)

Mazda CX-9 II (TC)

Mazda CX-9 (TB)

Audi Q3 Sportback (F3)Mazda CX-9 II (TC)Mazda CX-9 (TB)
Variants
35 TDI DCT
35 TDI quattro
35 TDI quattro DCT
35 TFSI
35 TFSI DCT
40 TDI 190 quattro DCT
40 TDI 200 quattro DCT
45 TFSI 230 quattro DCT
45 TFSI 245 quattro DCT
45 TFSI e DCT
AWD
FWD
3.5 AWD
3.7
3.7 2010+
3.7 2013+
3.7 AWD 2013+
3.7 AWD 2010+

Reviews

Neofiliac score32%37%65%
Pros
  • Low fuel consumption
  • Good marketing
  • Good styling
  • Rather good engine
  • High cargo capacity
  • High cargo capacity
  • Decent drivetrain reliability
Cons
  • Impractical and ugly
  • Only available with small engines
  • Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
  • Crossover nonsense
  • Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
  • Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)
RemoveRemoveRemove
Add up to 3 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on a best effort basis. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac respects your privacy. We do not track your activity on this website.