Compare Audi Q3 Sportback F3 vs Jeep Compass 2 vs Jeep Cherokee KK
Variants
35 TDI DCT
35 TDI quattro
35 TDI quattro DCT
35 TFSI
35 TFSI DCT
40 TDI 190 quattro DCT
40 TDI 200 quattro DCT
45 TFSI 230 quattro DCT
45 TFSI 245 quattro DCT
45 TFSI e DCT
1.3 130
1.3 150 DCT
1.3 190 4xe AT
1.3 240 4xe AT
1.4 MultiAir 140
1.4 MultiAir 170 4x4 AT
1.6 Multijet 120
1.6 Multijet 130
2.0 Multijet 140 4x4
2.0 Multijet 140 4x4 AT
2.0 Multijet 170 4x4 AT
2.8 CRD
3.7
Capacity
Cargo Capacity
419 L / 14.8 cu-ft ~ 1404 L / 49.6 cu-ft
Engine Oil Capacity
4.7 L / 5.0 qt
Passengers
5
5
5
Payload
540 kg / 1190 lbs
540 kg / 1190 lbs
Chassis
Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Ventilated discs
Offroad | Approach Angle
20.4 deg
Offroad | Departure Angle
17.7 deg
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Double wishbone
Suspension | Rear
Multi-link
Semi-independent
Solid axle
Tire Size
235/65 R17, 235/60 R18
Turning Circle
11.8 m / 38.7 ft
11.1 m / 36.3 ft
Water Fording
406 mm / 16.0 in
Construction
Battery | Capacity
13.0 kWh (gross)
11.4 kWh (gross)
Battery | Type
Lithium-ion
Body Style
5-door SUV
Dimensions
Size | Height
1797 mm / 70.7 in
Size | Length
4493 mm / 176.9 in
Size | Width
1839 mm / 72.4 in
Track Width | Front
1549.0 mm / 61.0 in
Track Width | Rear
1549.0 mm / 61.0 in
Weight
1980.0 kg / 4365.2 lbs
Wheelbase
2680 mm / 105.5 in
2636 mm / 103.8 in
2694 mm / 106.1 in
Performance
Acceleration | 0 - 100 km/h
10.5 sec
Acceleration | 0 - 60 mph
10.0 sec
Electric Range
61.0 km / 37.9 mi
Powertrain
Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (longitudinal), All-wheel drive
Emission Standard
Euro 4
Transmission | Gears
6-speed
Transmission | Type
Automatic
Production
Availability
2017
2008 ~ 2012
Debut
2018-07-25
2016 LA International Auto Show
Made In
Hungary, China
Mexico, Brazil, China, India, Italy
Reviews
Neofiliac score
32%
12%
25%
Pros
- Low fuel consumption
- Good marketing
- Marginal offroad capabilities
- Low fuel consumption
- Good offroad capabilities for a crossover
Cons
- Impractical and ugly
- Only available with small engines
- Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
- Ugly
- Crossover nonsense
- Only available with tiny engines
- Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
- Horrible 0-100kph time
- Can't even reach 200km/h
- No powerful engine options
- More a facelift than a new model
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.