Compare BMW 3 Series G20 vs Mercedes-Benz A-Class V177 vs Mercedes-Benz CLA C117 facelift

BMW 3 Series G20

Mercedes-Benz A-Class V177

Mercedes-Benz CLA C117 facelift

BMW 3 Series G20Mercedes-Benz A-Class V177Mercedes-Benz CLA C117 facelift
Variants
318d
318d AT
318i AT
320d
320d AT
320d xDrive AT
320e AT
320i AT
320i xDrive AT
330d AT
330d xDrive AT
330e AT
330e xDrive AT
330i AT
330i xDrive AT
M340d xDrive AT
M340i AT
A 180
A 180d DCT
A 200
A 200 4MATIC DCT
A 200 DCT
A 200d
A 200d 4MATIC DCT
A 220 4MATIC DCT
A 220d 4MATIC DCT
A 220d DCT
A 250 4MATIC DCT
A 250 DCT
A 250e DCT
AMG A 35 4MATIC DCT
CLA 45 AMG
CLA 180
CLA 180 DCT
CLA 180d
CLA 180d DCT
CLA 200
CLA 200 DCT
CLA 200d
CLA 200d 4MATIC DCT
CLA 200d DCT
CLA 220 4MATIC DCT
CLA 220d 4MATIC DCT
CLA 220d DCT
CLA 250
CLA 250 4MATIC DCT
CLA 250 DCT

Reviews

Neofiliac score68%36%22%
Pros
  • Decent styling
  • Closed-deck engines
  • Excellent 0.23 drag coefficient
  • Low fuel consumption
  • Decent performance
  • Excellent 0.23 drag coefficient
  • Down to very low 1.4L/100km fuel consumption
  • Excellent 0.23 drag coefficient
Cons
  • MacPherson strut front suspensions
  • Only available with small engines
  • Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
  • Small engines
  • Ugly hunchback styling
  • Build quality concerns
  • FWD platform

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)
RemoveRemoveRemove
Add up to 3 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on a best effort basis. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac respects your privacy. We do not track your activity on this website.