Compare Mazda CX-30 (DM) vs Volvo XC40 vs Mazda MX-30 (DR)

Mazda CX-30 (DM)

Volvo XC40

Mazda MX-30 (DR)

Mazda CX-30 (DM)Volvo XC40Mazda MX-30 (DR)
Variants
1.8 Skyactiv-D
1.8 Skyactiv-D AT
2.0 e-Skyactiv X
2.0 e-Skyactiv X AT
2.0 e-Skyactiv X AWD
2.0 e-Skyactiv X AWD AT
2.0 Skyactiv-G
2.0 Skyactiv-G AT
2.0 Skyactiv-G AWD
2.0 Skyactiv-G AWD AT
2.0 Skyactiv-X
2.0 Skyactiv-X AT
2.0 Skyactiv-X AWD
2.0 Skyactiv-X AWD AT
2.5 Skyactiv-G AT
T4 Recharge
T5 Recharge
T2 MT
T2
T3 MT
T3 Euro6d MT
T3
D3 MT
D3
D3 AWD MT
D3 AWD
D4 AWD
T4
T4 AWD
T5 AWD
Recharge Pure Electric Single Motor
Recharge Pure Electric AWD Twin Motor

Reviews

Neofiliac score54%32%4%
Pros
  • Interesting engine lineup
  • Compression-ignition Skyactiv-X engine
  • Decent styling
  • Up to 414km electric range
  • Low fuel consumption
  • Pay less tax
Cons
  • Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
  • Only available with small engines
  • Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
  • Miserably low engine output
  • Horrible hunchback crossover styling
  • Crossover nonsense
  • BEV nonsense
  • Rudimentary suspension setup

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)
RemoveRemoveRemove
Add up to 3 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on a best effort basis. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac respects your privacy. We do not track your activity on this website.