HomeArticlesProductsKeywordsCompanies

Compare Bentley Continental GT 3 vs Alfa Romeo Spider 916 vs Volkswagen Golf 6 Cabriolet

Variants
Continental GT Speed
Continental GT V8
Continental GT W12
1.8 T. Spark
2.0 JTS
2.0 T. Spark 150 Euro3
2.0 T. Spark 150
2.0 T. Spark 155
2.0 V6 TB
3.0 V6 192
3.0 V6 218
3.2 V6 240
1.2 TSI 105
1.2 TSI 105 Euro6
1.4 TSI 122
1.4 TSI 122 DSG
1.4 TSI 125
1.4 TSI 125 DSG
1.4 TSI 150
1.4 TSI 150 DSG
1.4 TSI 160
1.4 TSI 160 DSG
1.6 TDI 105
2.0 TDI 110
2.0 TDI 140
2.0 TDI 140 DSG
2.0 TDI 150
2.0 TDI 150 DSG
GTI 210
GTI 210 DSG
GTI 220 DSG
R 265 DSG

Capacity

Cargo Capacity
358 L / 12.6 cu-ft
250 L / 8.8 cu-ft
Fuel Capacity
90.0 L / 23.8 gal
70.0 L / 18.5 gal
55.0 L / 14.5 gal
Passengers
4
2
4

Chassis

Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Disc
Offroad | Approach Angle
11.7 deg
Offroad | Breakover Angle
9.7 deg
Offroad | Departure Angle
14.1 deg
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Hydraulic Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
Multi-link
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Multi-link
Double-wishbone
Multi-link
Tire Size
265/40 R21, 305/35 R21
Turning Circle
11.5 m / 37.8 ft
10.9 m / 35.8 ft

Construction

Body Style
2-door Coupe
2-door Convertible
2-door Convertible

Dimensions

Size | Height
1405 mm / 55.3 in
Size | Length
4850 mm / 190.9 in
Track Width | Front
1672.0 mm / 65.8 in
Track Width | Rear
1664.0 mm / 65.5 in
Wheelbase
2851 mm / 112.2 in
2540 mm / 100.0 in
2578 mm / 101.5 in

Performance

Coefficient Of Drag
0.29
0.38
Towing Capacity
1000 kg / 2205 lbs (w/ brakes @ 12% gradient)

Powertrain

Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (longitudinal), All-wheel drive
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Engine | Bore
84.0 mm / 3.3 in
82.5 mm / 3.2 in
Engine | Compression Ratio
10.5:1
9.6:1
Engine | Stroke
89.5 mm / 3.5 in
92.8 mm / 3.7 in
Fuel Capacity
90 L / 23.78 gal
Transmission | Gears
8-speed
Transmission | Type
Double clutch transmission (DCT)
Manual

Production

Debut
2017 Frankfurt Motor Show
Made In
UK

Reviews

Neofiliac score
90%
23%
30%
Pros
  • Much improved styling
  • Superb performance
  • Good 0.28 drag coefficient
  • High customizability
  • Improved interior
  • Decent engine offerings
  • Decent driving dynamics
  • Decent performance
  • Decent handling
Cons
  • Somewhat obnoxious
  • Only AWD
  • Quite ugly
  • No powerful engine options
  • High 0.38 drag coefficient
  • Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
  • Very little cargo space
  • Horrendous styling
  • Diesel nonsense
  • Only available with small engines
  • Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
  • Low cargo capacity

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.