Compare Bentley Flying Spur vs Volvo S90 vs Volvo S40

Bentley Motors | Cars

Volvo Cars | Cars

Variants

W12

Hybrid

D3 Euro6

D3 Euro6d

D3 Euro6 AT

D3 Euro6d AT

D4 Euro6

D4 Euro6d AT

D4 Euro6 AT

D4 Euro6 AWD AT

D5 Euro6 AWD AT

D5 Euro6d AWD AT

T4 Euro6 AT

T4 Euro6d AT

T5 Euro6 AT 2018

T5 Euro6d AT

T5 Euro6 AT 2017

T5 254PS AT

T6 Euro6d AWD AT

T6 Euro6 AWD

T6 Euro6 AWD AT

T8 AWD Hybrid

T8 AWD PHEV

1.6 105hp MT

1.6 105hp AT

1.6 109hp MT

1.8 115hp MT

1.8 115hp AT

1.8 122hp MT

1.8 GDI MT

1.9D 115hp MT

1.9D 102hp MT

1.9T MT

1.9T AT

1.9D 90hp MT

2.0 136hp MT

2.0 140hp MT

2.0 140hp AT

2.0T 160hp MT

2.0T 160hp AT

2.0T 165hp MT

Capacity

Cargo Capacity

420 L / 14.83 cu ft

500 L / 17.7 cu-ft

Fuel Capacity

60.0 L / 15.9 gal

Passengers

Chassis

Brakes | Front

Ventilated discs

Brakes | Rear

Disc

Offroad | Approach Angle

19.0 deg

Power Steering

Electric Steering

Hydraulic Steering

Suspension | Front

Double-wishbone

Wishbone

Suspension | Rear

Multi-link

Helical spring

Water Fording

250 mm / 9.8 in

Construction

Battery | Capacity

18.0 kWh (gross) | 14.1 kWh (net)

Battery | Type

Lithium-ion

Body Style

Full-size luxury sedan

4-door Sedan

Platform

Volkswagen MSB

Dimensions

Size | Height

1484 mm

Size | Length

5316 mm / 209.3 in

Size | Width

1987 mm

Wheel Size

15 in

Wheelbase

3194 mm / 125.7 in

Performance

Braking | 100 km/h - 0

35.0 m / 114.8 ft

Electric Range

40.0 km / 24.9 mi

Fuel Economy

14.8 L / 100 km, 19.1 mpg

Top Speed

333 km/h

Powertrain

Drivetrain Layout

Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive

Emission Standard

ULEV

Engine | Bore

82.0 mm / 3.2 in

Engine | Compression Ratio

10.5:1

Engine | Displacement

2.0 L / 120.2 cu-in / 1969.0 cc

Engine | Power

6.0 L W12, 4.0 L V8

Engine | Stroke

93.2 mm / 3.7 in

Fuel Capacity

90 L / 23.78 gal

Transmission | Gears

8-speed

Transmission | Type

Automatic ZF 8HP

Production

Debut

2019-06

Made In

Reviews

Neofiliac score

71%

70%

17%

Pros

Good power
Decent styling
Lots of luxury options

Elegant exterior design
Down to 4.7s 0-100kph time
Superb offroad capabilities
Good 0.26 drag coefficient
Down to very low 1.9L/100km fuel consumption
Good towing capacity

Solid safety rating

Cons

Hybrid nonsense
Downgrade from the Mulsanne

Only available with small engines

No powerful engine options
Only available with small engines
Questionable design
Not the best years of Volvo under Ford

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)

Remove

Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above

Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.