Compare Jeep Wrangler Unlimited JL vs Toyota 4Runner 4 vs Toyota Sequoia 2
Variants
2.0 Rubicon
2.0 Rubicon PHEV 4xe
2.0 Sport
2.2 Rubicon
2.2 Sahara
3.0 Rubicon EcoDiesel
3.0 Sport EcoDiesel
6.4 Rubicon 392 V8
4.0 236
4.0 236 4WD
4.0 245
4.0 245 4WD 4AT
4.0 245 4WD 5AT
4.7 235
4.7 235 4WD
4.7 260
4.7 260 4WD
4.7 270
4.7 270 4WD
4.6 AWD
4.6 RWD
4.7 AWD
4.7 RWD
5.7 AWD
Capacity
Cargo Capacity
535 L / 18.9 cu-ft ~ 3401 L / 120.1 cu-ft
Coolant Capacity
14.8 L / 15.6 qt
Engine Oil Capacity
7.5 L / 7.9 qt
Fuel Capacity
87.0 L / 23.0 gal
100.0 L / 26.4 gal
Passengers
5
Chassis
Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Ventilated discs
Disc
Chassis Type
Body on frame
Offroad | Approach Angle
27.0 deg
Offroad | Departure Angle
24.0 deg
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Hydraulic Steering
Suspension | Front
Leading link, Solid axle
Double-wishbone
Double-wishbone
Suspension | Rear
Trailing arm, Solid axle
Solid axle, Multi-link
Double-wishbone
Turning Circle
11.9 m / 39.0 ft
Construction
Body Style
Mid-size SUV
5-door SUV
5-door SUV
Dimensions
Size | Length
5210 mm / 205.1 in
Size | Width
2029 mm / 79.9 in
Track Width | Front
1575.0 mm / 62.0 in
1725.0 mm / 67.9 in
Track Width | Rear
1575.0 mm / 62.0 in
Wheel Size
7.5J x 17
8J x 18
Wheelbase
2790 mm / 109.8 in
3099 mm / 122.0 in
Performance
Acceleration | 0 - 100 km/h
7.8 sec
6.7 sec
Acceleration | 0 - 60 mph
7.4 sec
6.4 sec
Top Speed
188.0 km/h / 116.8 mph
Powertrain
Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (longitudinal), All-wheel drive
Emission Standard
Euro 6d
ULEV
Engine
1UR-FE
Engine | Bore
94.0 mm / 3.7 in
94.0 mm / 3.7 in
Engine | Compression Ratio
9.6:1
Fuel Capacity
21.5 gal
Transmission | Gears
8-speed
Transmission | Type
Automatic
Automatic
Production
Debut
2017-12 (LA Auto Show)
Made In
USA
Reviews
Neofiliac score
88%
76%
81%
Pros
- Iconic styling
- Large V8 available
- Superb offroad capabilities
- Body-on-frame
- Solid axle
- Superb build quality
- Superb offroad capabilities
- High cargo capacity
- Solid build quality
- Superb offroad capabilities
- Very high cargo capacity
- Excellent reliability record
Cons
- Horrible 0-100kph time
- Can't even reach 200km/h
- Low build quality
- Can't even reach 200km/h
- Awkward-looking
- High fuel consumption
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.