Compare Aston Martin DB11 Volante (AM5)
Aston Martin DB11 Volante (AM5) | |
---|---|
Reviews | |
Neofiliac score | 86% |
Pros |
|
Cons |
|
Price | |
Offers (incl. referral links) | |
Remove |
[[{"Ft":"Capacity","Fn":"Coolant Capacity","Fv":"18.6 L / 19.7 qt"},{"Ft":"Capacity","Fn":"Engine Oil Capacity","Fv":"8.5 L / 9.0 qt"},{"Ft":"Capacity","Fn":"Fuel Capacity","Fv":"78.0 L / 20.6 gal"},{"Ft":"Capacity","Fn":"Passengers","Fv":"4"},{"Ft":"Chassis","Fn":"Brakes | Front","Fv":"Ventilated discs"},{"Ft":"Chassis","Fn":"Brakes | Rear","Fv":"Ventilated discs"},{"Ft":"Chassis","Fn":"Power Steering","Fv":"Electric Steering"},{"Ft":"Chassis","Fn":"Suspension | Front","Fv":"Double-wishbone"},{"Ft":"Chassis","Fn":"Suspension | Rear","Fv":"Multi-link"},{"Ft":"Chassis","Fn":"Tire Size","Fv":"255/40 ZR20, 295/35 ZR20"},{"Ft":"Construction","Fn":"Body Style","Fv":"2-door Convertible"},{"Ft":"Dimensions","Fn":"Size | Height","Fv":"1300 mm / 51.2 in"},{"Ft":"Dimensions","Fn":"Size | Length","Fv":"4750 mm / 187.0 in"},{"Ft":"Dimensions","Fn":"Size | Width","Fv":"1950 mm / 76.8 in | 2060 mm / 81.1 in (mirror unfolded)"},{"Ft":"Dimensions","Fn":"Weight","Fv":"1870.0 kg / 4122.6 lbs"},{"Ft":"Dimensions","Fn":"Wheel Size","Fv":"9J x 20, 11.0J x 20"},{"Ft":"Dimensions","Fn":"Wheelbase","Fv":"2805 mm / 110.4 in"},{"Ft":"Performance","Fn":"Acceleration | 0 - 100 km/h","Fv":"4.1 sec"},{"Ft":"Performance","Fn":"Acceleration | 0 - 60 mph","Fv":"3.9 sec"},{"Ft":"Performance","Fn":"CO2 Emission","Fv":"255 g/km"},{"Ft":"Performance","Fn":"Fuel Economy","Fv":"11.6 L/100km / 20.3 MPG (combined)"},{"Ft":"Performance","Fn":"Top Speed","Fv":"300.0 km/h / 186.4 mph"},{"Ft":"Powertrain","Fn":"Drivetrain Layout","Fv":"Front-engine (longitudinal), Rear-wheel drive"},{"Ft":"Powertrain","Fn":"Engine | Bore","Fv":"83.0 mm / 3.3 in"},{"Ft":"Powertrain","Fn":"Engine | Compression Ratio","Fv":"10.5:1"},{"Ft":"Powertrain","Fn":"Engine | Displacement","Fv":"4.0 L / 243.0 cu-in / 3982.0 cc"},{"Ft":"Powertrain","Fn":"Engine | Power","Fv":"510.0 hp / 380.3 kW @ 6000 rpm"},{"Ft":"Powertrain","Fn":"Engine | Redline","Fv":"7200 rpm"},{"Ft":"Powertrain","Fn":"Engine | Specific Output","Fv":"128.1 hp/L / 2.1 hp/cu-in"},{"Ft":"Powertrain","Fn":"Engine | Stroke","Fv":"92.0 mm / 3.6 in"},{"Ft":"Powertrain","Fn":"Engine | Torque","Fv":"675 Nm / 497.9 lb-ft @ 2000-5000 rpm"},{"Ft":"Powertrain","Fn":"Engine | Type","Fv":"Bi-turbocharged direct-injected petrol V8 engine with 4 values per cylinder"},{"Ft":"Powertrain","Fn":"Transmission | Gears","Fv":"8-speed"},{"Ft":"Powertrain","Fn":"Transmission | Type","Fv":"Automatic"},{"Ft":"Production","Fn":"Availability","Fv":"2018"}]]
Related Products
BMW M6 F12 2012
- More power and torque than before
- Better electronics
- Manual transmission available
· 86%
Alpina B6 F12 2012
- Superb level of torque
- Good performance
- Double-wishbone + multi-link suspensions
· 84%
- Exceptional styling with top up or down
- Enjoyable 7500rpm redline
- Wonderful engine characteristics despite turbocharging
· 98%
BMW 6 Series F12 2011
- Double-wishbone + multi-link suspension setup
- Improved styling
- Great performance
· 77%
BMW 6 Series F12 LCI 2015
- Slightly improved engine reliability through updates
- Good ZF 8HP transmission
- Good looks
· 80%
BMW M8 F91 2019
- Rather good performance
- Powerful V8 (perhaps the last from BMW)
- Decent handling
· 87%
BMW 8 Series G14 2019
- Rather good styling
- Luxurious interior
- Decent performanceGood 0.28 drag coefficient
· 85%
Add up to 3 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on a best effort basis. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac respects your privacy. We do not track your activity on this website.