Compare Nissan GT-R R35 vs Audi A5 B8/8T3 facelift vs Nissan Altima 4 Coupe
Variants
2008
2011
2013
2017
Nismo
Track Edition
1.8 TFSI 170
1.8 TFSI 170 CVT
1.8 TFSI 177
1.8 TFSI 177 CVT
2.0 TDI 163
2.0 TDI 177
2.0 TDI 177 CVT
2.0 TDI 177 quattro
2.0 TDI 177 quattro DCT
2.0 TDI 190
2.0 TDI 190 CVT
2.0 TDI 190 quattro
2.0 TDI 190 quattro DCT
2.0 TFSI 225
2.0 TFSI 225 CVT
2.0 TFSI 225 quattro
2.0 TFSI 225 quattro DCT
2.0 TFSI 230
2.0 TFSI 230 CVT
2.0 TFSI 230 quattro
2.0 TFSI 230 quattro DCT
3.0 TDI
3.0 TDI CVT
3.0 TDI quattro
3.0 TDI quattro DCT
3.0 TDI quattro DCT
3.0 TFSI quattro DCT
2.5
3.5
Capacity
Cargo Capacity
454 L / 16.0 cu-ft
Coolant Capacity
11.3 L / 11.9 qt
Engine Oil Capacity
5.0 L / 5.3 qt
Fuel Capacity
76.0 L / 20.1 gal
Passengers
4
4
5
Payload
500 kg / 1102 lbs
Chassis
Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Disc
Disc
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
Double-wishbone
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Multi-link
Multi-link
Multi-link
Tire Size
215/55 R17
Construction
Body Style
2-door Coupe
2-door Coupe
Dimensions
Ground Clearance
105 mm / 4.1 in
Size | Height
1370 mm / 53.9 in
1405 mm / 55.3 in
Size | Length
4636 mm / 182.5 in
Size | Width
1895 mm / 74.6 in
1796 mm / 70.7 in
Track Width | Front
1542.0 mm / 60.7 in
Track Width | Rear
1600.0 mm / 63.0 in
1534.0 mm / 60.4 in
Wheelbase
2780 mm / 109.4 in
2675 mm / 105.3 in
Performance
Coefficient Of Drag
0.26
Top Speed
235.0 km/h / 146.0 mph
Powertrain
Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Engine
VR38DETT
Engine | Bore
95.5 mm / 3.8 in
89.0 mm / 3.5 in
Engine | Compression Ratio
9.0:1
9.5:1
Engine | Displacement
3.8 L / 231.8 cu-in / 3799.0 cc
Engine | Redline
7100 rpm
Engine | Stroke
88.4 mm / 3.5 in
100.0 mm / 3.9 in
Transmission | Gears
6-speed
6-speed
Transmission | Type
DCT
Manual
Production
Availability
2007 ~ 2012
Reviews
Neofiliac score
92%
58%
37%
Pros
- Exceptional sprint time
- Great performance overall
- Superb handling characteristics
- Up to enjoyable 7100rpm redline
- Good 0.26 drag coefficient
- Good diesel engines
- Decent styling
- Multi-link suspensions all around
- Reliable engines
- Decent exterior and interior finish
Cons
- Low cargo capacity
- Unreliable petrol engines
- CVT
- Unreliable petrol engines
- CVT
- Impractical
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.