Compare Nissan GT-R R35 vs Nissan Z RZ34 vs Nissan Altima 4 Coupe

Variants
2008
2011
2013
2017
Nismo
Track Edition
AT
MT
2.5
3.5

Capacity

Cargo Capacity
454 L / 16.0 cu-ft
Coolant Capacity
11.3 L / 11.9 qt
Engine Oil Capacity
5.0 L / 5.3 qt
Fuel Capacity
76.0 L / 20.1 gal
Passengers
4
2
5
Payload
500 kg / 1102 lbs

Chassis

Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Disc
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
Double-wishbone
Double-wishbone
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Multi-link
Multi-link
Multi-link
Tire Size
215/55 R17

Construction

Body Style
2-door Coupe
2-door Coupe

Dimensions

Ground Clearance
105 mm / 4.1 in
122 mm / 4.8 in
Size | Height
1370 mm / 53.9 in
1316 mm / 51.8 in
1405 mm / 55.3 in
Size | Length
4379 mm / 172.4 in
4636 mm / 182.5 in
Size | Width
1895 mm / 74.6 in
1844 mm / 72.6 in
1796 mm / 70.7 in
Track Width | Front
1542.0 mm / 60.7 in
Track Width | Rear
1600.0 mm / 63.0 in
1534.0 mm / 60.4 in
Wheelbase
2780 mm / 109.4 in
2550 mm / 100.4 in
2675 mm / 105.3 in

Performance

Coefficient Of Drag
0.26
Top Speed
235.0 km/h / 146.0 mph

Powertrain

Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (longitudinal), Rear-wheel drive
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Emission Standard
LEV2-LEV. Tier2-Bin5
Engine
VR38DETT
VR30DDTT
Engine | Bore
95.5 mm / 3.8 in
86.0 mm / 3.4 in
89.0 mm / 3.5 in
Engine | Compression Ratio
9.0:1
10.3:1
9.5:1
Engine | Displacement
3.8 L / 231.8 cu-in / 3799.0 cc
3.0 L / 182.9 cu-in / 2997.0 cc
Engine | Power
400.0 hp / 298.3 kW @ 6400 rpm
Engine | Redline
7100 rpm
6800 rpm
Engine | Specific Output
133.5 hp/L / 2.2 hp/cu-in
Engine | Stroke
88.4 mm / 3.5 in
86.0 mm / 3.4 in
100.0 mm / 3.9 in
Engine | Torque
475 Nm / 350.3 lb-ft @ 1600-5600 rpm
Engine | Type
Bi-turbocharged direct-injected petrol V6 DOHC engine with 4 values per cylinder
Transmission | Gears
6-speed
6-speed
Transmission | Type
DCT
Manual

Production

Availability
2021
2007 ~ 2012
Debut
2021-08
Made In
Japan

Reviews

Neofiliac score
92%
80%
37%
Pros
  • Exceptional sprint time
  • Great performance overall
  • Superb handling characteristics
  • Up to enjoyable 7100rpm redline
  • Good 0.26 drag coefficient
  • Rather good performance
  • Affordable pricing
  • Usable trunk
  • Reliable engines
  • Decent exterior and interior finish
Cons
  • Low cargo capacity
  • Unsophisticated chassis
  • Average handling
  • CVT
  • Impractical

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.