Compare Maserati MC20
Maserati MC20 | |
---|---|
Reviews | |
Neofiliac score | 86% |
Pros |
|
Cons |
|
Price | |
Offers (incl. referral links) | |
Remove |
[[{"Ft":"Capacity","Fn":"Cargo Capacity","Fv":"150 L / 5.3 cu-ft"},{"Ft":"Capacity","Fn":"Fuel Capacity","Fv":"60.0 L / 15.9 gal"},{"Ft":"Capacity","Fn":"Passengers","Fv":"2"},{"Ft":"Chassis","Fn":"Brakes | Front","Fv":"Ventilated discs, 380-390x34-36 mm"},{"Ft":"Chassis","Fn":"Brakes | Rear","Fv":"Ventilated discs, 350-360x27-28 mm"},{"Ft":"Chassis","Fn":"Suspension | Front","Fv":"Double-wishbone"},{"Ft":"Chassis","Fn":"Suspension | Rear","Fv":"Double-wishbone"},{"Ft":"Chassis","Fn":"Tire Size","Fv":"Front wheel tires: 245/35 ZR20 Rear wheel tires: 305/30 ZR20"},{"Ft":"Construction","Fn":"Body Style","Fv":"2-door Coupe"},{"Ft":"Dimensions","Fn":"Size | Height","Fv":"1221 mm / 48.1 in"},{"Ft":"Dimensions","Fn":"Size | Length","Fv":"4669 mm / 183.8 in"},{"Ft":"Dimensions","Fn":"Size | Width","Fv":"1965 mm / 77.4 in"},{"Ft":"Dimensions","Fn":"Track Width | Front","Fv":"1681.0 mm / 66.2 in"},{"Ft":"Dimensions","Fn":"Track Width | Rear","Fv":"1649.0 mm / 64.9 in"},{"Ft":"Dimensions","Fn":"Weight","Fv":"1500.0 kg / 3306.9 lbs"},{"Ft":"Dimensions","Fn":"Wheel Size","Fv":"Front wheel rims: 20 Rear wheel rims: 20"},{"Ft":"Dimensions","Fn":"Wheelbase","Fv":"2700 mm / 106.3 in"},{"Ft":"Performance","Fn":"Acceleration | 0 - 100 km/h","Fv":"2.9 sec"},{"Ft":"Performance","Fn":"Acceleration | 0 - 60 mph","Fv":"2.8 sec"},{"Ft":"Performance","Fn":"Braking | 100 km/h - 0","Fv":"33.0 m / 108.2 ft"},{"Ft":"Performance","Fn":"CO2 Emission","Fv":"262 g/km"},{"Ft":"Performance","Fn":"Coefficient Of Drag","Fv":"0.38"},{"Ft":"Performance","Fn":"Fuel Economy","Fv":"11.6 L/100km / 20.3 MPG (combined)"},{"Ft":"Performance","Fn":"Top Speed","Fv":"325.0 km/h / 201.9 mph"},{"Ft":"Powertrain","Fn":"Drivetrain Layout","Fv":"Rear-engine (longitudinal), Rear-wheel drive"},{"Ft":"Powertrain","Fn":"Engine | Bore","Fv":"88.0 mm / 3.5 in"},{"Ft":"Powertrain","Fn":"Engine | Compression Ratio","Fv":"11.0:1"},{"Ft":"Powertrain","Fn":"Engine | Displacement","Fv":"3.0 L / 183.1 cu-in / 3000.0 cc"},{"Ft":"Powertrain","Fn":"Engine | Power","Fv":"630.0 hp / 469.8 kW @ 7500 rpm"},{"Ft":"Powertrain","Fn":"Engine | Specific Output","Fv":"210.0 hp/L / 3.4 hp/cu-in"},{"Ft":"Powertrain","Fn":"Engine | Stroke","Fv":"82.0 mm / 3.2 in"},{"Ft":"Powertrain","Fn":"Engine | Torque","Fv":"730 Nm / 538.4 lb-ft @ 3000-5500 rpm"},{"Ft":"Powertrain","Fn":"Engine | Type","Fv":"Bi-turbocharged direct- and multi-port-injected petrol V6 DOHC engine"},{"Ft":"Powertrain","Fn":"Transmission | Gears","Fv":"8-speed"},{"Ft":"Powertrain","Fn":"Transmission | Type","Fv":"Double clutch transmission (DCT)"},{"Ft":"Production","Fn":"Availability","Fv":"2020"}]]
Related Products
McLaren 650S 2014
- Quick and fast
- Glorious 8500rpm redline in a bi-turbo engine
- Simplified styling compared to the 12C
· 85%
- Much more approachable than the F1
- Glorious 8500rpm redline
- Double-wishbone suspensions all around
· 83%
Ford GT 2 2017
- Up to awe-inspiring 656hp of power and 746Nm of torque
- Superb offroad capabilities
· 63%
Bugatti Veyron 2005
- Insane amount of power and torque
- Neck-breaking acceleration
- Exceptionally luxurious customization and finish
· 98%
- Superb performance
- Up to awe-inspiring 730hp of power and 800Nm of torque
- More focused than its predecessors
· 91%
McLaren 720S 2017
- Great performance
- Up to awe-inspiring 765PS of power and 800Nm of torque
- Glorious 8500rpm redline
· 90%
Add up to 3 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on a best effort basis. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac respects your privacy. We do not track your activity on this website.