Compare Cadillac ATS Coupe vs Audi RS 5 F5 vs Audi TT 8J

Variants
2.0
2.0 AT
2.0 AWD
3.6 AT
3.6 AWD AT
ATS-V
ATS-V AT
Pre-facelift
Facelift
1.8 TFSI
1.8 TFSI Euro5
2.0 TDI quattro
2.0 TDI Euro5 quattro
2.0 TFSI 200
2.0 TFSI 200 quattro DCT
2.0 TFSI 200 DCT
2.0 TFSI 211
2.0 TFSI 211 quattro DCT
2.0 TFSI 211 DCT
3.2 quattro
3.2 quattro DCT

Capacity

Cargo Capacity
295 L / 10.4 cu-ft
Coolant Capacity
14.7 L / 15.5 qt
Engine Oil Capacity
7.6 L / 8.0 qt
Fuel Capacity
58.0 L / 15.3 gal
Passengers
4
4
Payload
400 kg / 882 lbs

Chassis

Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Offroad | Approach Angle
17.0 deg
Offroad | Departure Angle
12.6 deg
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
Multi-link
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Multi-link
Multi-link
Multi-link
Turning Circle
11.7 m / 38.4 ft
11.0 m / 35.9 ft

Construction

Body Style
2-door Coupe
2-door Coupe
2-door Coupe

Dimensions

Size | Length
4723 mm / 185.9 in
Size | Width
1841 mm / 72.5 in
Track Width | Front
1598.0 mm / 62.9 in
Track Width | Rear
1588.0 mm / 62.5 in
Wheel Size
9J x 19
Wheelbase
2775 mm / 109.3 in
2766 mm / 108.9 in
2468 mm / 97.2 in

Performance

Acceleration | 0 - 100 km/h
3.9 sec
Acceleration | 0 - 60 mph
3.7 sec
Coefficient Of Drag
0.32
Top Speed
298.0 km/h / 185.2 mph
250.0 km/h / 155.3 mph
Towing Capacity
454 kg / 1001 lbs (w/o brakes)

Powertrain

Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (longitudinal), All-wheel drive
Emission Standard
Euro 6
Engine
DECA
Engine | Bore
84.5 mm / 3.3 in
Engine | Compression Ratio
10.0:1
Engine | Displacement
2.9 L / 176.6 cu-in / 2894.0 cc
Engine | Power
450.0 hp / 335.6 kW @ 5700-6700 rpm
Engine | Specific Output
155.5 hp/L / 2.5 hp/cu-in
Engine | Stroke
86.0 mm / 3.4 in
Engine | Torque
600 Nm / 442.5 lb-ft @ 1900-5000 rpm
Transmission | Gears
8-speed
6-speed
Transmission | Type
Automatic tiptronic

Reviews

Neofiliac score
69%
76%
62%
Pros
  • Decent performance
  • Up to enjoyable 7200rpm redline
  • Good 0.28 drag coefficient
  • Good styling
  • Good performance
  • Somewhat athletic styling
  • Smoother styling than the TTS and TT RS
  • VR6 engine
  • Decent handling
Cons
  • Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
  • Low cargo capacity
  • Very tight inside
  • Rather ugly for a coupe
  • Nose-heavy
  • No V8
  • Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
  • Not RWD

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.