Compare Toyota C-HR facelift vs Toyota Harrier 3 (XU60) vs Toyota Harrier 4 / Venza 2 (XU80)

Toyota C-HR facelift

Toyota Harrier 3 (XU60)

Toyota Harrier 4 / Venza 2 (XU80)

Toyota C-HR faceliftToyota Harrier 3 (XU60)Toyota Harrier 4 / Venza 2 (XU80)
Variants
1.2
1.2 AWD CVT
1.2 CVT
1.8 Hybrid
2.0 CVT
2.0 Hybrid
2.0 AWD CVT
2.0 CVT
2.0T AWD AT
2.0T AT
2.5 Hybrid AWD CVT
2.0 AWD CVT
2.0 CVT
2.5 Hybrid
2.5 Hybrid AWD

Reviews

Neofiliac score42%42%29%
Pros
  • Good engine reliability
  • Decent styling
  • Low fuel consumption
  • Low fuel consumption
  • Good build quality
  • Decent styling
  • Low fuel consumption
Cons
  • Poor performance
  • Only available with small engines
  • Impractical
  • Small engines
  • Slow and sluggish
  • No powerful engine options
  • Crossover nonsense

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)
RemoveRemoveRemove
Add up to 3 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on a best effort basis. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac respects your privacy. We do not track your activity on this website.