Compare Toyota C-HR facelift vs Toyota Harrier 3 (XU60) vs Toyota C-HR facelift

Toyota C-HR facelift

Toyota Harrier 3 (XU60)

Toyota C-HR facelift

Toyota C-HR faceliftToyota Harrier 3 (XU60)Toyota C-HR facelift
Variants
1.2
1.2 AWD CVT
1.2 CVT
1.8 Hybrid
2.0 CVT
2.0 Hybrid
2.0 AWD CVT
2.0 CVT
2.0T AWD AT
2.0T AT
2.5 Hybrid AWD CVT
1.2
1.2 AWD CVT
1.2 CVT
1.8 Hybrid
2.0 CVT
2.0 Hybrid

Reviews

Neofiliac score42%42%42%
Pros
  • Good engine reliability
  • Decent styling
  • Low fuel consumption
  • Low fuel consumption
  • Good build quality
  • Good engine reliability
  • Decent styling
  • Low fuel consumption
Cons
  • Poor performance
  • Only available with small engines
  • Impractical
  • Small engines
  • Slow and sluggish
  • Poor performance
  • Only available with small engines
  • Impractical

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)
RemoveRemoveRemove
Add up to 3 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on a best effort basis. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac respects your privacy. We do not track your activity on this website.