Compare Chevrolet Trailblazer 3 vs Opel Antara vs Opel Crossland X

Variants
1.2 CVT
1.3 AWD AT
1.3 CVT
ACTIV 1.3 AWD AT
ACTIV 1.3 CVT
RS 1.3 AWD AT
RS 1.3 CVT
2.0 CDTI 127
2.2 CDTI 163 AT
2.2 CDTI 163 AWD AT
2.2 CDTI 163 AWD
2.2 CDTI 184 AWD AT
2.2 CDTI 184 AWD
2.2 CDTI 184
2.2 CDTI 184 AT
2.4 167 AWD
2.4 167 AWD AT
2.4 167
2.4 167 AT
2.4 150
2.4 150 AT
3.2 227
1.2 81
1.2 83
1.2 Turbo 110
1.2 Turbo 110 AT
1.2 Turbo 110 Euro6d
1.2 Turbo 110 Euro6d AT
1.2 Turbo 130 Euro6d
1.2 Turbo 130
1.2 Turbo 130 Euro6d AT
1.5d 102
1.5d 120 AT
1.6 120
1.6 99

Capacity

Cargo Capacity
716 L / 25.3 cu-ft ~ 1540 L / 54.4 cu-ft
410 L / 14.5 cu-ft ~ 1255 L / 44.3 cu-ft
Fuel Capacity
50.0 L / 13.2 gal
65.0 L / 17.2 gal
45.0 L / 11.9 gal
Passengers
5
5
5

Chassis

Brakes | Front
Disc
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Disc
Disc
Disc
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Semi-independent, Torsion
Trailing arm
Semi-independent
Tire Size
225/70 R16
Turning Circle
11.4 m / 37.4 ft
11.2 m / 36.7 ft

Construction

Body Style
5-door SUV
5-door SUV
5-door SUV

Dimensions

Size | Height
1605 mm / 63.2 in
Size | Length
4212 mm / 165.8 in
Size | Width
1808 mm / 71.2 in
1850 mm / 72.8 in
Track Width | Front
1513.0 mm / 59.6 in
Track Width | Rear
1557.0 mm / 61.3 in
1491.0 mm / 58.7 in
Wheel Size
16 in
Wheelbase
2640 mm / 103.9 in
2707 mm / 106.6 in
2604 mm / 102.5 in

Performance

Towing Capacity
495 kg / 1091 lbs (w/ brakes @ 12% gradient)

Powertrain

Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Emission Standard
Euro 5
Engine | Bore
75.0 mm / 3.0 in
Engine | Type
Turbocharged direct-injected petrol inline-3 DOHC engine

Production

Availability
2020

Reviews

Neofiliac score
7%
19%
6%
Pros
  • Easy to park
  • Not the worst vehicle on the market
  • Low official fuel consumption
Cons
  • No powerful engine options
  • Ugly
  • Crossover nonsense
  • Basic suspension setup
  • Bad 0-100kph time
  • No powerful engine options
  • Basic suspension setup
  • Rather ugly
  • Horrible 0-100kph time
  • Miserably low engine output
  • Only available with small engines
  • No independent rear suspensions

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.