Compare Jeep Renegade facelift vs Opel Mokka vs Opel Crossland X

Variants
1.0 T-GDI 120
1.3 T-GDI 180 4x4 AT
1.3 Turbo 150 DCT
1.3 Turbo 190 4xe AT
1.3 Turbo 240 4xe AT
1.6 Multijet 120
1.6 Multijet 120 DCT
2.0 Multijet 140 4x4
2.0 Multijet 140 4x4 AT
2.0 Multijet 170 4x4 AT
2.4 MultiAir2 182 4x4 AT
2.4 MultiAir2 182 AT
1.4 Turbo
1.4 Turbo AT
1.4 Turbo AWD
1.6
1.6 CDTI 110
1.6 CDTI 136
1.6 CDTI 136 AT
1.6 CDTI 136 AWD
1.7 CDTI 130
1.7 CDTI 130 AWD
1.2 81
1.2 83
1.2 Turbo 110
1.2 Turbo 110 AT
1.2 Turbo 110 Euro6d
1.2 Turbo 110 Euro6d AT
1.2 Turbo 130 Euro6d
1.2 Turbo 130
1.2 Turbo 130 Euro6d AT
1.5d 102
1.5d 120 AT
1.6 120
1.6 99

Capacity

Cargo Capacity
356 L / 12.6 cu-ft ~ 1372 L / 48.5 cu-ft
410 L / 14.5 cu-ft ~ 1255 L / 44.3 cu-ft
Coolant Capacity
6.4 L / 6.8 qt
5.3 L / 5.6 qt
Engine Oil Capacity
5.2 L / 5.5 qt
Fuel Capacity
45.0 L / 11.9 gal
Passengers
5
5
5

Chassis

Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Disc
Disc
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
MacPherson strut
Semi-independent, coil spring
Semi-independent
Tire Size
215/55 R18
Turning Circle
11.2 m / 36.7 ft
Water Fording
400 mm / 15.7 in

Construction

Battery | Capacity
11.4 kWh (gross)
Body Style
5-door SUV
5-door SUV

Dimensions

Ground Clearance
158 mm / 6.2 in
Size | Height
1605 mm / 63.2 in
Size | Length
4278 mm / 168.4 in
4212 mm / 165.8 in
Track Width | Front
1540.0 mm / 60.6 in
1513.0 mm / 59.6 in
Track Width | Rear
1540.0 mm / 60.6 in
1491.0 mm / 58.7 in
Wheelbase
2570 mm / 101.2 in
2555 mm / 100.6 in
2604 mm / 102.5 in

Performance

Towing Capacity
500 kg / 1102 lbs (w/o brakes) | 1500 kg / 3307 lbs (w/ brakes @ 12% gradient)

Powertrain

Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Engine | Bore
75.0 mm / 3.0 in
Engine | Compression Ratio
16.0:1
Engine | Redline
6400 rpm

Reviews

Neofiliac score
11%
8%
6%
Pros
  • Low fuel consumption
  • Looks decent from some angles
  • Low official fuel consumption
Cons
  • Very ugly
  • No powerful engine options
  • Short full-electric range
  • Stuck with MacPherson struts at all four corners
  • Horrible 0-100kph time
  • Can't even reach 200km/h
  • Miserably low engine output
  • Only available with small engines
  • No independent rear suspensions
  • Rather ugly
  • Horrible 0-100kph time
  • Miserably low engine output
  • Only available with small engines
  • No independent rear suspensions

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.