Compare BMW X2 F39 vs Peugeot 3008 II vs Peugeot 4007 / Mitsubishi Outlander

BMW X2 F39

Peugeot 3008 II

Peugeot 4007 / Mitsubishi Outlander

BMW X2 F39Peugeot 3008 IIPeugeot 4007 / Mitsubishi Outlander
Variants
sDrive18d
sDrive18d AT
xDrive18d
xDrive18d AT
sDrive18i
sDrive18i AT
sDrive20d AT
xDrive20d AT
sDrive20i AT
sDrive20i Euro6d AT
xDrive20i AT
xDrive20i Euro6d AT
xDrive25d AT
xDrive25d AT
xDrive25e AT
M35i AT
1.2 130 AT
1.2 130
1.5 HDi 130 AT
1.5 HDi 130
1.6 HDi 100
1.6 HDi 120 AT
1.6 HDi 120
1.6 180 AT
1.6 PHEV
1.6 THP 165 AT
2.0 HDi 150
GT 2.0 HDi 177
GT 2.0 HDi 180
2.2D
2.2D AT
2.4

Reviews

Neofiliac score34%21%34%
Pros
  • Good 0.28 drag coefficient
  • Low fuel consumption
  • Fully independent suspension setup
Cons
  • Ugly styling
  • Crossover nonsense
  • Only available with small engines
  • Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
  • No powerful engine options
  • Only available with small engines
  • No independent rear suspensions
  • Horrible 0-100kph time
  • No powerful engine options
  • Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)
RemoveRemoveRemove
Add up to 3 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on a best effort basis. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac respects your privacy. We do not track your activity on this website.