Compare BMW X2 F39 vs Mini Countryman F60 LCI vs Chevrolet Trax / Holden Trax / Chevrolet Tracker (U200)

BMW X2 F39

Mini Countryman F60 LCI

Chevrolet Trax / Holden Trax / Chevrolet Tracker (U200)

BMW X2 F39Mini Countryman F60 LCIChevrolet Trax / Holden Trax / Chevrolet Tracker (U200)
Variants
sDrive18d
sDrive18d AT
xDrive18d
xDrive18d AT
sDrive18i
sDrive18i AT
sDrive20d AT
xDrive20d AT
sDrive20i AT
sDrive20i Euro6d AT
xDrive20i AT
xDrive20i Euro6d AT
xDrive25d AT
xDrive25d AT
xDrive25e AT
M35i AT
Cooper
Cooper ALL4 AT
Cooper AT
Cooper D 1.5
Cooper D 1.5 AT
Cooper D 2.0
Cooper D 2.0 ALL4 AT
Cooper D 2.0 AT
Cooper S
Cooper S ALL4 AT
Cooper S AT
Cooper SD ALL4 AT
Cooper SD AT
Cooper SE ALL4 AT
1.4 AT
1.4 AWD AT
1.4 Turbo AWD
1.6
1.7D
1.7D AT
1.7D AWD

Reviews

Neofiliac score34%32%23%
Pros
  • Good 0.28 drag coefficient
  • Low fuel consumption
  • Decent handling
  • Decent drivetrain reliability
Cons
  • Ugly styling
  • Crossover nonsense
  • Only available with small engines
  • Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
  • Poor performance
  • Only available with small engines
  • Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
  • Horrible styling
  • Crossover nonsense
  • Limited utility
  • Somewhat ugly
  • Horrible 0-100kph time
  • Can't even reach 200km/h
  • Miserably low engine output
  • Only available with small engines
  • Basic suspension setup

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)
RemoveRemoveRemove
Add up to 3 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on a best effort basis. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac respects your privacy. We do not track your activity on this website.