Compare Mazda MX-30 (DR) vs Mazda CX-3 (DK) vs Mazda CX-9 II (TC)

Mazda MX-30 (DR)

Mazda CX-3 (DK)

Mazda CX-9 II (TC)

Mazda MX-30 (DR)Mazda CX-3 (DK)Mazda CX-9 II (TC)
Variants
1.5d
1.5d 4WD
1.5d AWD AT
1.8 Skyactiv-D
1.8 Skyactiv-D AWD
1.8 Skyactiv-D AT
2.0 Skyactiv-G 121
2.0 Skyactiv-G 121 AT
2.0 Skyactiv-G 148 AT
2.0 Skyactiv-G 150 AWD
2.0 Skyactiv-G 150 AWD AT
2.0i
2.0i AT
AWD
FWD

Reviews

Neofiliac score4%23%37%
Pros
  • Pay less tax
  • Decent engine reliability
  • Good styling
  • Rather good engine
  • High cargo capacity
Cons
  • Miserably low engine output
  • Horrible hunchback crossover styling
  • Crossover nonsense
  • BEV nonsense
  • Rudimentary suspension setup
  • Bad 0-100kph time
  • No powerful engine options
  • Only available with small engines
  • Poor suspension setup
  • Crossover nonsense
  • Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)
RemoveRemoveRemove
Add up to 3 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on a best effort basis. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac respects your privacy. We do not track your activity on this website.