Compare Volvo XC40 vs Mercedes-Benz EQC N293 vs Mercedes-Benz ML-Class W164 facelift

Volvo XC40

Mercedes-Benz EQC N293

Mercedes-Benz ML-Class W164 facelift

Volvo XC40Mercedes-Benz EQC N293Mercedes-Benz ML-Class W164 facelift
Variants
T4 Recharge
T5 Recharge
T2 MT
T2
T3 MT
T3 Euro6d MT
T3
D3 MT
D3
D3 AWD MT
D3 AWD
D4 AWD
T4
T4 AWD
T5 AWD
Recharge Pure Electric Single Motor
Recharge Pure Electric AWD Twin Motor
ML 63 AMG
ML 280 CDI
ML 300 CDI
ML 300 CDI Euro5
ML 320 CDI
ML 350 CDI Euro6
ML 350 CDI
ML 350 CDI Euro5
ML 350 Euro5
ML 350
ML 420 CDI
ML 450 CDI
ML 450 HYBRID
ML 500
ML 500 Euro5

Reviews

Neofiliac score32%28%74%
Pros
  • Up to 414km electric range
  • Low fuel consumption
  • Up to 436km electric range
  • Good 0.28 drag coefficient
  • Decent styling
  • Improved reliability
  • Some offroad capabilities
  • High cargo capacity
  • Good towing capacity
  • Some interesting engine options
Cons
  • Only available with small engines
  • Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
  • Can't even reach 200km/h
  • BEV nonsense
  • Greenwashing
  • Hybrid nonsense

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)
RemoveRemoveRemove
Add up to 3 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on a best effort basis. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac respects your privacy. We do not track your activity on this website.