Compare Volvo XC40 vs Mercedes-Benz EQC N293 vs Mercedes-Benz EQA H243

Volvo XC40

Mercedes-Benz EQC N293

Mercedes-Benz EQA H243

Volvo XC40Mercedes-Benz EQC N293Mercedes-Benz EQA H243
Variants
T4 Recharge
T5 Recharge
T2 MT
T2
T3 MT
T3 Euro6d MT
T3
D3 MT
D3
D3 AWD MT
D3 AWD
D4 AWD
T4
T4 AWD
T5 AWD
Recharge Pure Electric Single Motor
Recharge Pure Electric AWD Twin Motor
EQA 250
EQA 300 4MATIC
EQA 350 4MATIC+

Reviews

Neofiliac score32%28%26%
Pros
  • Up to 414km electric range
  • Low fuel consumption
  • Up to 436km electric range
  • Good 0.28 drag coefficient
  • Decent styling
  • Up to 426km electric range
Cons
  • Only available with small engines
  • Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
  • Can't even reach 200km/h
  • BEV nonsense
  • Greenwashing
  • Bland and ugly
  • Can't even reach 200km/h
  • No powerful engine options
  • Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)
RemoveRemoveRemove
Add up to 3 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on a best effort basis. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac respects your privacy. We do not track your activity on this website.