Compare Jaguar F-Pace facelift vs Nissan Murano 3 vs Nissan Rogue 2
Variants
P400e
D165
D200
P250
D300
SVR
2.5 Hybrid AWD
3.5
3.5 AWD
2.0 AWD Hybrid CVT
2.0 Hybrid CVT
2.5 AWD CVT
2.5 CVT
Capacity
Coolant Capacity
6.7 L / 7.1 qt
Engine Oil Capacity
4.3 L / 4.5 qt
4.6 L / 4.9 qt
Fuel Capacity
72.0 L / 19.0 gal
Passengers
5
5
5
Chassis
Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Offroad | Approach Angle
13.8 deg
17.4 deg
Offroad | Breakover Angle
15.8 deg
18.6 deg
Offroad | Departure Angle
24.4 deg
25.0 deg
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
Double-wishbone
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Multi-link
Multi-link
Multi-link
Tire Size
235/65 R18, 235/55 R20
Turning Circle
11.8 m / 38.7 ft
Water Fording
500 mm / 19.7 in
Construction
Battery | Capacity
17.1 kWh (gross)
Dimensions
Ground Clearance
213 mm / 8.4 in
175 mm / 6.9 in
Size | Length
4897 mm / 192.8 in
Size | Width
2175 mm / 85.6 in (mirror unfolded) | 2071 mm / 81.5 in (mirror folded)
1915 mm / 75.4 in
1839 mm / 72.4 in
Track Width | Front
1641.0 mm / 64.6 in
1595.0 mm / 62.8 in
Track Width | Rear
1641.0 mm / 64.6 in
1595.0 mm / 62.8 in
Wheelbase
2874 mm / 113.1 in
2824 mm / 111.2 in
2705 mm / 106.5 in
Performance
Acceleration | 0 - 100 km/h
8.3 sec
Acceleration | 0 - 60 mph
7.9 sec
Coefficient Of Drag
0.31
Electric Range
53.0 km / 32.9 mi
Top Speed
210.0 km/h / 130.5 mph
Towing Capacity
680 kg / 1499 lbs (w/ brakes @ 12% gradient)
500 kg / 1102 lbs (w/o brakes)
Powertrain
Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (longitudinal), All-wheel drive
Engine | Bore
95.5 mm / 3.8 in
Engine | Compression Ratio
10.3:1
Engine | Redline
6600 rpm
Engine | Stroke
81.4 mm / 3.2 in
Transmission | Gears
8-speed
Transmission | Type
Automatic ZF
CVT
Production
Availability
2020
Reviews
Neofiliac score
68%
24%
37%
Pros
- Good performance
- Some offroad capabilities
- Low fuel consumption
- Cheap to purchase
- Some offroad capabilities
- Improved styling
- Improved interior appointments
Cons
- Mid-size crossover nonsense
- Bad 0-100kph time
- Poor CVT
- Low build quality
- No powerful engine options
- Bad engine reputation
- Unreliable CVTs
- Poor handling
- MacPherson front suspensions
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.