Compare Jaguar E-Pace facelift vs Mini Countryman F60 LCI vs Chevrolet Trax / Holden Trax / Chevrolet Tracker (U200)

Jaguar E-Pace facelift

Mini Countryman F60 LCI

Chevrolet Trax / Holden Trax / Chevrolet Tracker (U200)

Jaguar E-Pace faceliftMini Countryman F60 LCIChevrolet Trax / Holden Trax / Chevrolet Tracker (U200)
Variants
P160
P300e AWD
D165 MT
D165 AWD
D200 AWD
P200 AWD
P250 AWD
P300 AWD
Cooper
Cooper ALL4 AT
Cooper AT
Cooper D 1.5
Cooper D 1.5 AT
Cooper D 2.0
Cooper D 2.0 ALL4 AT
Cooper D 2.0 AT
Cooper S
Cooper S ALL4 AT
Cooper S AT
Cooper SD ALL4 AT
Cooper SD AT
Cooper SE ALL4 AT
1.4 AT
1.4 AWD AT
1.4 Turbo AWD
1.6
1.7D
1.7D AT
1.7D AWD

Reviews

Neofiliac score35%32%23%
Pros
  • Low fuel consumption
  • Low fuel consumption
  • Decent handling
  • Decent drivetrain reliability
Cons
  • Only available with small engines
  • Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
  • Low build quality
  • Poor performance
  • Only available with small engines
  • Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
  • Horrible styling
  • Crossover nonsense
  • Limited utility
  • Somewhat ugly
  • Horrible 0-100kph time
  • Can't even reach 200km/h
  • Miserably low engine output
  • Only available with small engines
  • Basic suspension setup

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)
RemoveRemoveRemove
Add up to 3 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on a best effort basis. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac respects your privacy. We do not track your activity on this website.