Compare Toyota Sienna 3 facelift vs Skoda Roomster vs Toyota Ractis
Variants
AWD
FWD
1.2 64
1.2 70
1.2 TDI 75
1.2 TSI 105
1.2 TSI 105 AT
1.2 TSI 86
1.4 86 Euro5
1.4 86
1.4 TDI 70
1.4 TDI 80
1.6 105
1.6 105 AT
1.6 TDI 105
1.6 TDI 90
1.9 TDI 103
1.3
1.5
Capacity
Cargo Capacity
1107 L / 39.1 cu-ft ~ 4248 L / 150.0 cu-ft
450 L / 15.9 cu-ft ~ 1780 L / 62.9 cu-ft
Fuel Capacity
75.0 L / 19.8 gal
55.0 L / 14.5 gal
Passengers
5
5
Payload
275 kg / 606 lbs
Chassis
Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Disc
Drum
Drum
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Multi-link
Semi-independent, Torsion beam
Semi-independent Torsion
Tire Size
235/60 R17, 235/55 R18
175/60 R16
Construction
Body Style
5-door Minivan
5-door Minivan
5-door Minivan
Dimensions
Size | Height
1607 mm / 63.3 in
1640 mm / 64.6 in
Size | Length
5095 mm / 200.6 in
3995 mm / 157.3 in
Size | Width
1984 mm / 78.1 in
1684 mm / 66.3 in
1695 mm / 66.7 in
Track Width | Front
1720.0 mm / 67.7 in
1485.0 mm / 58.5 in
Track Width | Rear
1720.0 mm / 67.7 in
1475.0 mm / 58.1 in
Wheel Size
17 in, 18 in
Wheelbase
3030 mm / 119.3 in
2550 mm / 100.4 in
Performance
Fuel Economy
5.5 L/100km / 42.8 MPG (highway)
Towing Capacity
1588 kg / 3501 lbs (w/ brakes @ 12% gradient)
Powertrain
Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Emission Standard
Euro 4
Engine
2GR-FKS
1NZ-FE
Engine | Displacement
3.5 L / 213.6 cu-in / 3500.0 cc
Engine | Power
296.0 hp / 220.7 kW @ 6600 rpm
Engine | Specific Output
84.6 hp/L / 1.4 hp/cu-in
Engine | Torque
357 Nm / 263.3 lb-ft @ 4700 rpm
Engine | Type
Naturally-aspirated direct-injected petrol V6 DOHC engine with 4 values per cylinder
Naturally-aspirated multi-port injected petrol inline-4 DOHC engine with 4 values per cylinder
Transmission | Gears
8-speed
Transmission | Type
Automatic ECT-i
Production
Availability
2018
2005 ~ 2010
Reviews
Neofiliac score
63%
17%
12%
Pros
- Exceptionally high reliability
- Great comfort
- Very high cargo capacity
- Lots of usable space inside for such a small car
- Very easy to drive and park
Cons
- Boring
- Horrible 0-100kph time
- Can't even reach 200km/h
- Miserably low engine output
- Only available with small engines
- No independent rear suspensions
- Miserably low engine output
- Only available with tiny engines
- No independent rear suspensions
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.