Compare BMW 2 Series Active Tourer U06 vs Renault Grand Modus vs Renault Grand Scenic 4

Variants
218d
218i
220i
223i
1.2
1.2 TCe
1.5 dCi 103 AT
1.5 dCi 68
1.5 dCi 86 5MT
1.5 dCi 86 6MT
1.6 AT
1.2 TCe 115
1.2 TCe 130
1.3 TCe 115
1.3 TCe 140
1.3 TCe 140 AT
1.3 TCe 160
1.3 TCe 160 AT
1.3 TCe 115
1.3 TCe 140 AT
1.3 TCe 140
1.3 TCe 160 AT
1.3 TCe 160
1.5 dCi 110
1.5 dCi 110 AT
1.5 dCi 110 Hybrid
1.6 dCi 130
1.6 dCi 160 AT
1.7 dCi 120
1.7 dCi 120 AT
1.7 dCi 150
1.7 dCi 150 AT

Capacity

Cargo Capacity
305 L / 10.8 cu-ft ~ 1454 L / 51.3 cu-ft
Fuel Capacity
45.0 L / 11.9 gal
51.0 L / 13.5 gal
53.0 L / 14.0 gal
Passengers
5
5
5 / 7

Chassis

Brakes | Front
Disc
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs, 320 mm
Brakes | Rear
Disc
Drum
Disc, 290 mm
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Multi-link
Semi-independent, coil spring
Semi-independent, coil spring
Turning Circle
11.4 m / 37.4 ft
10.4 m / 34.1 ft
11.4 m / 37.4 ft

Construction

Body Style
5-door Hatchback

Dimensions

Ground Clearance
171 mm / 6.7 in
120 mm / 4.7 in
Size | Height
1576 mm / 62.0 in
1589 mm / 62.6 in
Size | Length
4386 mm / 172.7 in
4034 mm / 158.8 in
Size | Width
1824 mm / 71.8 in
1709 mm / 67.3 in | 1960 mm / 77.2 in (mirror unfolded)
1866 mm / 73.5 in | 2128 mm / 83.8 in (mirror unfolded)
Track Width | Front
1586.0 mm / 62.4 in
1472.0 mm / 58.0 in
1602.0 mm / 63.1 in
Track Width | Rear
1587.0 mm / 62.5 in
1450.0 mm / 57.1 in
1596.0 mm / 62.8 in
Wheel Size
20 in
Wheelbase
2670 mm / 105.1 in
2575 mm / 101.4 in
2804 mm / 110.4 in

Powertrain

Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Emission Standard
Euro 6d
Euro 4
Transmission | Gears
7-speed
Transmission | Type
Automatic Steptronic

Production

Availability
2021
2004 ~ 2012

Reviews

Neofiliac score
32%
3%
10%
Pros
  • Good 0.26 drag coefficient
  • Small turning circle
  • Low fuel consumption
  • Low fuel consumption
Cons
  • Very ugly
  • No powerful engine options
  • Only available with small engines
  • Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
  • Very ugly
  • Horrible 0-100kph time
  • Can't even reach 200km/h
  • Miserably low engine output
  • Only available with tiny engines
  • No independent rear suspensions
  • Very ugly
  • Horrible 0-100kph time
  • No powerful engine options
  • Only available with small engines
  • Poor suspension setup

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.