Compare Chrysler Pacifica 2 vs Toyota Alphard 3 vs Toyota Wish 2

Variants
Pacifica Hybrid
Pacifica
2.5 AWD Hybrid
2.5 AWD CVT
2.5 CVT
3.5 AT
3.5 AWD AT
1.8 131 4WD
1.8 133 4WD
1.8 143
1.8i 144
2.0 152
2.0 158

Capacity

Cargo Capacity
915 L / 32.3 cu-ft ~ 3979 L / 140.5 cu-ft
Coolant Capacity
6.8 L / 7.2 qt
Engine Oil Capacity
4.7 L / 5.0 qt
Fuel Capacity
60.0 L / 15.9 gal
Passengers
7
7

Chassis

Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Ventilated discs
Offroad | Breakover Angle
12.5 deg
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Multi-link
Multi-link
Multi-link
Tire Size
235/65 R17, 235/60 R18, 245/50 R20
225/60 R17, 235/50 R18
Turning Circle
12.1 m / 39.7 ft

Construction

Body Style
5-door Minivan

Dimensions

Ground Clearance
150 mm / 5.9 in
Size | Height
1777 mm / 70.0 in
Size | Length
5176 mm / 203.8 in
4945 mm / 194.7 in
Size | Width
2022 mm / 79.6 in | 2297 mm / 90.4 in (mirror unfolded)
1850 mm / 72.8 in
Track Width | Front
1600.0 mm / 63.0 in
Wheel Size
7J x 17, 7.5J x 18, 7.5J x 20
17 in, 18 in
Wheelbase
3089 mm / 121.6 in
3000 mm / 118.1 in
2750 mm / 108.3 in

Performance

Acceleration | 0 - 100 km/h
8.3 sec
Acceleration | 0 - 60 mph
7.9 sec
Coefficient Of Drag
0.30
Fuel Economy
10.5 L/100km / 22.4 MPG (combined) | 14.3 L/100km / 16.4 MPG (urban) | 8.3 L/100km / 28.3 MPG (highway)
Top Speed
200.0 km/h / 124.3 mph
Towing Capacity
1633 kg / 3600 lbs (w/ brakes @ 12% gradient)

Powertrain

Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Emission Standard
Euro 5
Engine | Bore
96.0 mm / 3.8 in
80.5 mm / 3.2 in
Engine | Compression Ratio
10.0:1
Engine | Displacement
3.6 L / 220.0 cu-in / 3605.0 cc
Engine | Redline
6400 rpm
Engine | Stroke
83.0 mm / 3.3 in
Engine | Torque
355 Nm / 261.8 lb-ft @ 4000 rpm
Engine | Type
Naturally-aspirated multi-port injected petrol inline-4 DOHC engine with 4 values per cylinder
Transmission | Gears
8-speed
Transmission | Type
CVT

Production

Availability
2016

Reviews

Neofiliac score
56%
54%
33%
Pros
  • Good styling
  • Very high cargo capacity
  • Large interior space
  • Very comfortable
  • High comfort
  • Aggressive styling
  • Large interior space
  • Reliable drivetrain
  • Small turning circle
  • Coherent styling
Cons
  • Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
  • Bad 0-100kph time
  • Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
  • No powerful engine options
  • Only available with small engines

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.