Compare Volvo V60 II vs Volvo V60 Cross Country vs Seat Leon 3 ST
Variants
B3
B4
B5
B5 AWD
B6 AWD
D3
D3 AWD
D3 MT
D4
D4 AWD
D4 MT
Polestar
T4
T5
T5 AWD
T6 AWD
T6 TwEn AWD
T8 TwEn AWD
D3
D3 AT
D4
D4 AT
T5 AT
T5 AWD AT
D4 AWD AT
D5 AWD AT
T5 AWD AT
1.0 EcoTSI 115
1.0 TSI 115
1.0 TSI 115 DSG
1.0 TSI 86
1.2 TSI 110
1.2 TSI 110 DSG
1.2 TSI 86
1.4 TGI 110 CNG
1.4 TGI 110 CNG DSG
1.4 TSI (150 Hp) ACT start/stop
1.4 TSI 125
1.4 TSI 150 ACT
1.4 TSI 150 ACT DSG
1.5 EcoTSI 130
1.5 EcoTSI 150
1.5 EcoTSI 150 DSG
1.5 TGI 130
1.5 TGI 130 DSG
1.5 TSI 130
1.5 TSI 150
1.5 TSI 150 DSG
1.6 TDI 105
1.6 TDI 105 AWD
1.6 TDI 105 DSG
1.6 TDI 110
1.6 TDI 115
1.6 TDI 115 AWD
1.6 TDI 115 DSG
1.6 TDI 90
1.6 TDI 90 Euro6
1.8 TSI
1.8 TSI DSG
2.0 TDI 110
2.0 TDI 150
2.0 TDI 150 AWD
2.0 TDI 150 AWD DSG
2.0 TDI 150 DSG
2.0 TDI 184
2.0 TDI 184 DSG
2.0 TSI 190 DSG
Cupra 2.0 TSI 265
Cupra 2.0 TSI 265 DSG
Cupra 2.0 TSI 280
Cupra 2.0 TSI 280 DSG
Cupra 2.0 TSI 290
Cupra 2.0 TSI 290 DSG
Cupra 2.0 TSI 300
Cupra 2.0 TSI 300 AWD DSG
Cupra 2.0 TSI 300 DSG
Capacity
Coolant Capacity
8.9 L / 9.4 qt
Fuel Capacity
67.5 L / 17.8 gal
Passengers
5
5
5
Chassis
Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Disc
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
Double-wishbone
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Multi-link
Multi-link
Construction
Body Style
5-door Station Wagon
5-door Station Wagon
Dimensions
Ground Clearance
201 mm / 7.9 in
Size | Height
1545 mm / 60.8 in
Size | Length
4761 mm / 187.4 in
Size | Width
1850 mm / 72.8 in | 2040 mm / 80.3 in (mirror unfolded) | 1916 mm / 75.4 in (mirror folded)
Track Width | Front
1593.0 mm / 62.7 in
1619.0 mm / 63.7 in
Track Width | Rear
1593.0 mm / 62.7 in
1577.0 mm / 62.1 in
Wheelbase
2872 mm / 113.1 in
2774 mm / 109.2 in
Performance
Braking | 100 km/h - 0
35.0 m / 114.8 ft
Coefficient Of Drag
0.29
0.34
Towing Capacity
1900 kg / 4189 lbs (w/ brakes @ 8% gradient) | 1600 kg / 3527 lbs (w/ brakes @ 12% gradient)
Powertrain
Emission Standard
Euro 6d
Euro 6
Engine | Bore
82.0 mm / 3.2 in
Engine | Displacement
2.0 L / 120.2 cu-in / 1969.0 cc
Engine | Stroke
93.2 mm / 3.7 in
Reviews
Neofiliac score
62%
27%
24%
Pros
- Good styling
- Good 0.28 drag coefficient
- Low fuel consumption
- Good towing capacity
- Manual transmission still available
- Inline-5 still available (though not for much longer)
- Very low official fuel consumption
- Small turning circle
Cons
- Only available with small engines
- Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
- Uglified version of V60
- Only available with small engines
- Semi-independent suspensions on FWD models
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.