Compare Subaru Outback 6 vs Subaru Legacy 4 Wagon vs Subaru Outback 6
Variants
2.5 182 CVT
2.5 188 CVT
2.4T
2.4T
2.0
2.0 AT
2.0R
2.0R AT
2.5
2.5 AT
3.0R AT
3.0R spec.B AT
2.5 182 CVT
2.5 188 CVT
2.4T
2.4T
Capacity
Fuel Capacity
64.0 L / 16.9 gal
Passengers
5
5
5
Chassis
Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Disc
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Hydraulic Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Double-wishbone
Multi-link
Double-wishbone
Turning Circle
10.8 m / 35.4 ft
Construction
Body Style
5-door Station Wagon
5-door Station Wagon
5-door Station Wagon
Dimensions
Size | Height
1470 mm / 57.9 in
Size | Length
4720 mm / 185.8 in
Size | Width
1730 mm / 68.1 in
Track Width | Front
1495.0 mm / 58.9 in
Track Width | Rear
1490.0 mm / 58.7 in
Wheelbase
2670 mm / 105.1 in
Performance
CO2 Emission
169 g/km
169 g/km
Powertrain
Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (longitudinal), All-wheel drive
Engine | Bore
94.0 mm / 3.7 in
94.0 mm / 3.7 in
Transmission | Type
CVT
CVT
Reviews
Neofiliac score
54%
54%
54%
Pros
- Superb offroad capabilities
- High cargo capacity
- Good towing capacity
- Good handlding characteristics
- Very, very handsome
- Great H6 engine
- Subaru's signature symmetric AWD system
- Superb offroad capabilities
- High cargo capacity
- Good towing capacity
- Good handlding characteristics
Cons
- Horrible 0-100kph time
- CVT
- Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
- Horrible 0-100kph time
- CVT
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.