Compare Jaguar XF Sportbrake X260 facelift vs Jaguar XF Sportbrake X250 vs Jaguar XF Sportbrake X260

Variants
20d
20d AWD
25t
30t AWD
2.2 TDi4 163
2.2 TDi4 200
3.0 TDV6 240
S 3.0 TDV6 275
2.0 AT
2.0 AWD AT
2.0d 163PS
2.0d 163PS AT
2.0d 180PS AT
2.0d 180PS AWD AT
2.0d 240PS AWD AT
20d AT
20d AWD AT
25d AWD AT
25t AT
3.0 AWD AT
3.0d AT
30d AWD AT
30t AWD AT
E-Performance
E-Performance AT

Capacity

Cargo Capacity
550 L / 19.4 cu-ft ~ 1675 L / 59.2 cu-ft
565 L / 20.0 cu-ft ~ 1700 L / 60.0 cu-ft
Fuel Capacity
70.1 L / 18.5 gal
Passengers
5
5
5

Chassis

Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Ventilated discs, 325 mm
Ventilated discs
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
Double-wishbone
Double-wishbone
Double-wishbone
Suspension | Rear
Multi-link
Double-wishbone
Multi-link
Turning Circle
11.6 m / 37.9 ft
11.9 m / 39.2 ft

Construction

Body Style
5-door Station Wagon
5-door Station Wagon

Dimensions

Size | Height
1494 mm / 58.8 in
1496 mm / 58.9 in
Size | Length
4964 mm / 195.4 in
4966 mm / 195.5 in
4955 mm / 195.1 in
Size | Width
2089 mm / 82.2 in (mirror unfolded) | 1982 mm / 78.0 in (mirror folded)
1877 mm / 73.9 in
1987 mm / 78.2 in | 2091 mm / 82.3 in (mirror unfolded)
Track Width | Front
1602.0 mm / 63.1 in
1559.0 mm / 61.4 in
1605.0 mm / 63.2 in
Track Width | Rear
1604.0 mm / 63.1 in
1605.0 mm / 63.2 in
1607.0 mm / 63.3 in
Wheelbase
2960 mm / 116.5 in
2909 mm / 114.5 in
2960 mm / 116.5 in

Powertrain

Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (longitudinal), Rear-wheel drive
Emission Standard
Euro 6d
Engine | Bore
83.0 mm / 3.3 in
Engine | Displacement
2.0 L / 121.9 cu-in / 1997.0 cc
Engine | Stroke
92.3 mm / 3.6 in
Transmission | Gears
8-speed
8-speed
Transmission | Type
Automatic ZF
Automatic

Production

Availability
2020
2012 ~ 2015

Reviews

Neofiliac score
69%
63%
70%
Pros
  • Good 0.28 drag coefficient
  • Great styling
  • Double-wishbone all-around
  • Good ZF 8HP transmission
  • Elegant yet imposing styling
  • Double-wishbone + multi-link suspension setup
  • Good towing capacity
  • Beautiful design (though barely updated)
  • Manual transmission more widely available
Cons
  • Only available with small engines
  • Long-term reliability concerns
  • Plasticky
  • Questionable engine reliability
  • Question on long-term engine reliability

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.