Compare Fiat 500 facelift vs Fiat Punto 199 vs Fiat 500 facelift
Variants
0.9 TwinAir 105
0.9 TwinAir 85
0.9 TwinAir 85 Euro6d
0.9 TwinAir 85 AT
0.9 TwinAir 85 Euro6d AT
1.0 70
1.2 69
1.2 69 Euro6d
1.2 69 AT
1.2 69 Euro6d AT
1.3 MultiJet 95
1.4 MultiAir 135
1.4 MultiAir 135 AT
0.9 TwinAir 105
0.9 TwinAir 85
1.2 69
1.3 Multijet 85
1.3 Multijet 95
1.4 77
1.4 MultiAir 105
1.4 T-Jet 135
0.9 TwinAir 105
0.9 TwinAir 85
0.9 TwinAir 85 Euro6d
0.9 TwinAir 85 AT
0.9 TwinAir 85 Euro6d AT
1.0 70
1.2 69
1.2 69 Euro6d
1.2 69 AT
1.2 69 Euro6d AT
1.3 MultiJet 95
1.4 MultiAir 135
1.4 MultiAir 135 AT
Capacity
Fuel Capacity
45.0 L / 11.9 gal
Passengers
4
5
4
Chassis
Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Semi-independent
Semi-independent, Torsion beam
Semi-independent
Construction
Body Style
3/5-door Hatchback
Dimensions
Ground Clearance
114 mm / 4.5 in
114 mm / 4.5 in
Size | Length
4065 mm / 160.0 in
Size | Width
1687 mm / 66.4 in
Track Width | Front
1473.0 mm / 58.0 in
Track Width | Rear
1466.0 mm / 57.7 in
Wheelbase
2300 mm / 90.6 in
2510 mm / 98.8 in
2300 mm / 90.6 in
Performance
Coefficient Of Drag
0.362
0.34
0.362
Towing Capacity
400 kg / 882 lbs (w/o brakes) | 1000 kg / 2205 lbs (w/ brakes @ 12% gradient)
Powertrain
Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Engine | Redline
6500 rpm
6500 rpm
Transmission | Type
Manual
Reviews
Neofiliac score
25%
16%
25%
Pros
- Great styling
- Low fuel consumption
- Small turning circle
- Low fuel consumption
- Small turning circle
- Great styling
- Low fuel consumption
- Small turning circle
Cons
- Horrible performance
- Miserably low engine output
- Only available with tiny engines
- High 0.36 drag coefficient
- Poor suspension setup
- Bad 0-100kph time
- Miserably low engine output
- Only available with tiny engines
- No independent rear suspensions
- Horrible performance
- Miserably low engine output
- Only available with tiny engines
- High 0.36 drag coefficient
- Poor suspension setup
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.