Compare Hyundai Accent 5 Hatchback vs Hyundai Accent 3 Hatchback vs Hyundai i10 II

Variants
1.6 GDI
1.6 GDI AT
1.6 DPi
1.6 DPi CVT
1.4
1.4 AT
1.5 CRDi
1.6
1.6 AT
1.0
1.0 AT
1.0 LPG
1.25
1.25 AT

Capacity

Cargo Capacity
616 L / 21.8 cu-ft
270 L / 9.5 cu-ft
252 L / 8.9 cu-ft ~ 1046 L / 36.9 cu-ft
Fuel Capacity
45.0 L / 11.9 gal
45.0 L / 11.9 gal
40.0 L / 10.6 gal
Passengers
5
5
5
Payload
421 kg / 928 lbs

Chassis

Brakes | Front
Disc
Disc
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Drum
Drum
Disc
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Hydraulic Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Semi-independent, Torsion beam
Semi-independent, Torsion beam
Semi-independent, Torsion beam
Tire Size
185/65 R14
155/70 R13, 175/65 R14, 185/55 R15
Turning Circle
8.4 m / 27.6 ft
10.2 m / 33.5 ft
9.6 m / 31.5 ft

Construction

Body Style
5-door Hatchback
3-door Hatchback
5-door Hatchback

Dimensions

Size | Height
1450 mm / 57.1 in
1470 mm / 57.9 in
1500 mm / 59.1 in
Size | Length
4185 mm / 164.8 in
4045 mm / 159.3 in
3665 mm / 144.3 in
Size | Width
1729 mm / 68.1 in
1695 mm / 66.7 in
1660 mm / 65.4 in
Track Width | Front
1472.0 mm / 58.0 in
1491.0 mm / 58.7 in
Track Width | Rear
1462.0 mm / 57.6 in
1504.0 mm / 59.2 in
Weight
1159.0 kg / 2555.2 lbs
Wheel Size
5.5 J x14
4.5J x 13, 5.5J x 14, 5.5J x 14, 6.0J x 15
Wheelbase
2580 mm / 101.6 in
2500 mm / 98.4 in
2385 mm / 93.9 in

Powertrain

Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Emission Standard
Euro 4
Euro 5
Engine | Bore
75.6 mm / 3.0 in
71.0 mm / 2.8 in
Engine | Compression Ratio
11.2:1
10.5:1
Engine | Stroke
89.0 mm / 3.5 in
Transmission | Gears
6-speed

Production

Availability
2006 ~ 2010
2013 ~ 2016

Reviews

Neofiliac score
15%
18%
5%
Pros
  • Very small turning circle
  • Decent engine reliability
  • Small turning circle
  • Much improved styling
  • Small turning circle
Cons
  • Miserably low engine output
  • Bland in styling
  • Low build quality
  • Horrible 0-100kph time
  • Can't even reach 200km/h
  • Miserably low engine output
  • Only available with tiny engines
  • No independent rear suspensions
  • Low cargo capacity
  • Horrible 0-100kph time
  • Can't even reach 200km/h
  • Miserably low engine output
  • Only available with tiny engines
  • No independent rear suspensions
  • Poor transmissions

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.