Compare Citroen C1 II 5-door vs Citroen DS3 vs Citroen C2

Variants
1.0 69
1.0 69 ETG
1.0 72
1.0 72 ETG
1.2 82
Airscape 1.0 72
1.2 e-VTi PureTech ETG
1.2 PureTech 110
1.2 PureTech 82
1.2 PureTech 82 ETG
1.4 e-HDi 70 ETG
1.4 HDi 70
1.4 VTi 95 ETG
1.4 VTi 95 GPL
1.4 VTi Airdream 95
1.6 BlueHDi 100
1.6 BlueHDi 120
1.6 e-HDi 110
1.6 e-HDi 115
1.6 e-HDi 90
1.6 e-HDi 90 ETG
1.6 HDi 110
1.6 THP 150
1.6 THP 165
1.6 VTi 120
1.6 VTi 120 AT
Racing 1.6 T 202
Racing 1.6 T 207
1.1i
1.1i Euro4
1.4 HDi
1.4 HDi AT
1.4 HDi Euro4
1.4i 75
1.4i 75 AT
1.4i 90 AT
1.6i 110 AT
1.6 HDi 110
1.6i 110 AT
1.6i 125

Capacity

Cargo Capacity
196 L / 6.9 cu-ft ~ 780 L / 27.5 cu-ft
166 L / 5.9 cu-ft ~ 879 L / 31.0 cu-ft
Coolant Capacity
3.6 L / 3.8 qt
Fuel Capacity
35.0 L / 9.2 gal
41.0 L / 10.8 gal
Passengers
4
5

Chassis

Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Semi-independent, coil spring
Semi-independent, Torsion beam
Semi-independent, coil spring
Turning Circle
9.6 m / 31.5 ft

Construction

Body Style
5-door Hatchback
3-door Hatchback
3-door Hatchback

Dimensions

Ground Clearance
120 mm / 4.7 in
Size | Height
1460 mm / 57.5 in
Size | Length
3466 mm / 136.5 in
3666 mm / 144.3 in
Size | Width
1615 mm / 63.6 in | 1884 mm / 74.2 in (mirror unfolded)
1659 mm / 65.3 in | 1898 mm / 74.7 in (mirror unfolded)
Wheelbase
2340 mm / 92.1 in
2464 mm / 97.0 in
2315 mm / 91.1 in

Performance

Coefficient Of Drag
0.31

Powertrain

Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Transmission | Gears
5-speed
5-speed

Reviews

Neofiliac score
14%
21%
3%
Pros
  • Good 0.28 drag coefficient
  • Low fuel consumption
  • Small turning circle
  • Low official fuel consumption
  • Small turning circle
  • Less ugly than the C3
  • Small turning circle
  • Easy to drive and park
Cons
  • Horrible performance
  • Miserably low engine output
  • Only available with tiny engines
  • Poor suspension setup
  • No powerful engine options
  • Only available with small engines
  • No independent rear suspensions
  • Bad 0-100kph time
  • Miserably low engine output
  • Only available with tiny engines
  • No independent rear suspensions
  • Ugly

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.