Compare SEAT Ibiza 5 facelift vs SEAT Ibiza 5 vs Alfa Romeo MiTo facelift

Variants
1.0 MPI
1.0 TGI
1.0 TSI 110
1.0 TSI 110 DSG
1.0 TSI 95
1.5 TSI DSG
1.0 TSI 115
1.0 TSI 115 Euro6d
1.0 TSI 115 DSG
1.0 TSI 115 Euro6d DSG
1.0 TSI 95
1.0 TSI 95
1.0 65
1.0 75
1.0 80
1.0 80 Euro6d
1.0 TGI 90 CNG
1.0 TGI 90 CNG
1.5 TSI 150 DSG
1.5 TSI 150
1.6 110
1.6 110 AT
1.6 90
1.6 TDI 80
1.6 TDI 95
1.6 TDI 95 Euro6d
1.6 TDI 95 DSG
0.9 TwinAir 105
1.3 JTD 85
1.4 70
1.4 78
1.4 TB MultiAir 140 TCT
1.4 TB MultiAir 170 TCT

Capacity

Cargo Capacity
270 L / 9.5 cu-ft
Fuel Capacity
45.0 L / 11.9 gal
Passengers
5
5

Chassis

Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Disc
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Semi-independent, coil spring
Semi-independent, Torsion beam
Semi-independent, coil spring
Turning Circle
10.6 m / 34.8 ft

Construction

Body Style
5-door Hatchback
5-door Hatchback
3-door Hatchback

Dimensions

Size | Height
1444 mm / 56.9 in
1444 mm / 56.9 in
1446 mm / 56.9 in
Size | Length
4059 mm / 159.8 in
4059 mm / 159.8 in
4063 mm / 160.0 in
Size | Width
1780 mm / 70.1 in | 1942 mm / 76.5 in (mirror unfolded)
1780 mm / 70.1 in | 1942 mm / 76.5 in (mirror unfolded)
1720 mm / 67.7 in
Track Width | Front
1525.0 mm / 60.0 in
1525.0 mm / 60.0 in
1483.0 mm / 58.4 in
Track Width | Rear
1505.0 mm / 59.3 in
1505.0 mm / 59.3 in
1475.0 mm / 58.1 in
Wheelbase
2564 mm / 100.9 in
2564 mm / 100.9 in
2511 mm / 98.9 in

Powertrain

Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Emission Standard
Euro 6 AP
Engine | Bore
74.5 mm / 2.9 in

Production

Availability
2021
2013 ~ 2018

Reviews

Neofiliac score
12%
17%
23%
Pros
  • Cheap to purchase
  • Low official fuel consumption
  • More coherent design than Mk4
  • Low official fuel consumption
Cons
  • Poor performance
  • Only available with tiny engines
  • No independent rear suspensions
  • Build quality concerns
  • No powerful engine options
  • Only available with small, unreliable engines
  • No independent rear suspensions
  • No powerful engine options
  • Tiny engines
  • No independent rear suspensions
  • Low cargo capacity
  • More emission control systems to fail

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.