HomeArticlesProductsKeywordsCompanies

Compare SEAT Leon 4 vs Chevrolet Volt 2 vs Chevrolet Sonic 2 facelift

Variants
1.0 eTSI DSG
1.0 TSI 110
1.0 TSI 90
1.4 e-HYBRID DSG
1.5 eTSI DSG
1.5 TGI
1.5 TGI DSG
1.5 TSI 130
1.5 TSI 150
2.0 TDI 115
2.0 TDI 150 DSG
2.0 TSI DSG
1.4
1.4 AT
1.8
1.8 AT

Capacity

Cargo Capacity
301 L / 10.6 cu-ft
539 L / 19.0 cu-ft ~ 1351 L / 47.7 cu-ft
Coolant Capacity
7.0 L / 7.4 qt
Engine Oil Capacity
4.0 L / 4.2 qt
Fuel Capacity
33.7 L / 8.9 gal
46.0 L / 12.2 gal
Passengers
5
5
5

Chassis

Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Ventilated discs
Drum
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Semi-independent, Torsion beam
Semi-independent, Torsion
Semi-independent, coil spring
Tire Size
215/50 R17
Turning Circle
10.5 m / 34.4 ft
11.1 m / 36.4 ft
10.5 m / 34.4 ft

Construction

Battery | Capacity
12.8 kWh (gross)
18.4 kWh (gross)
Body Style
5-door plug-in hybrid Hatchback
5-door Hatchback

Dimensions

Size | Height
1432 mm / 56.4 in
1506 mm / 59.3 in
Size | Length
4368 mm / 172.0 in
4582 mm / 180.4 in
4059 mm / 159.8 in
Size | Width
1809 mm / 71.2 in
1735 mm / 68.3 in
Track Width | Front
1540.0 mm / 60.6 in
1509.0 mm / 59.4 in
Track Width | Rear
1516.0 mm / 59.7 in
1570.0 mm / 61.8 in
1509.0 mm / 59.4 in
Weight
1607.0 kg / 3542.8 lbs
Wheel Size
7.0J x 17
Wheelbase
2694 mm / 106.1 in
2525 mm / 99.4 in

Performance

Coefficient Of Drag
0.33
Electric Range
58.0 km / 36.0 mi
Fuel Economy
5.6 L/100km / 42.0 MPG (urban)

Powertrain

Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Engine | Bore
74.0 mm / 2.9 in
Engine | Compression Ratio
12.5:1
Engine | Displacement
1.5 L / 90.9 cu-in / 1490.0 cc
Engine | Power
101.0 hp / 75.3 kW @ 5600 rpm + 149.0 hp / 111.1 kW (electric motor)
Engine | Redline
5600 rpm
Engine | Specific Output
67.8 hp/L / 1.1 hp/cu-in
Engine | Stroke
86.6 mm / 3.4 in
Engine | Type
direct-injected petrol inline-4 DOHC engine with 4 values per cylinder
Transmission | Type
Multi-mode electric

Production

Availability
2016 ~ 2019

Reviews

Neofiliac score
17%
26%
20%
Pros
  • Low official fuel consumption
  • Less ugly than before
  • Longer range than Mk1
  • Decent exterior design
  • OKish engine reliability
Cons
  • Poorly built
  • Only available with small engines
  • No independent rear suspensions
  • Miserably low engine output
  • Only available with tiny engines
  • No independent rear suspensions
  • Low cargo capacity
  • Miserably low engine output
  • Only available with small engines
  • Poor suspension setup
  • Nasty interior

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.