HomeArticlesProductsKeywordsCompanies

Compare SEAT Leon 4 vs Chevrolet Cruze 2 Hatchback vs Chevrolet Volt 2

Variants
1.0 eTSI DSG
1.0 TSI 110
1.0 TSI 90
1.4 e-HYBRID DSG
1.5 eTSI DSG
1.5 TGI
1.5 TGI DSG
1.5 TSI 130
1.5 TSI 150
2.0 TDI 115
2.0 TDI 150 DSG
2.0 TSI DSG
1.4
1.4 AT
1.4 Turbo AT
1.6 TD
1.6 TD AT

Capacity

Cargo Capacity
301 L / 10.6 cu-ft
Coolant Capacity
7.0 L / 7.4 qt
Engine Oil Capacity
4.0 L / 4.2 qt
Fuel Capacity
33.7 L / 8.9 gal
Passengers
5
5
5

Chassis

Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Ventilated discs
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Semi-independent, Torsion beam
Semi-dependent beam with stabilizer lateral stability, Trailing arm, Coil spring
Semi-independent, Torsion
Tire Size
215/50 R17
Turning Circle
10.5 m / 34.4 ft
11.8 m / 38.7 ft
11.1 m / 36.4 ft

Construction

Battery | Capacity
12.8 kWh (gross)
18.4 kWh (gross)
Body Style
5-door Hatchback
5-door plug-in hybrid Hatchback

Dimensions

Size | Height
1432 mm / 56.4 in
Size | Length
4368 mm / 172.0 in
4453 mm / 175.3 in
4582 mm / 180.4 in
Size | Width
1791 mm / 70.5 in
1809 mm / 71.2 in
Track Width | Front
1540.0 mm / 60.6 in
Track Width | Rear
1516.0 mm / 59.7 in
1552.0 mm / 61.1 in
1570.0 mm / 61.8 in
Weight
1607.0 kg / 3542.8 lbs
Wheel Size
7.0J x 17
Wheelbase
2700 mm / 106.3 in
2694 mm / 106.1 in

Performance

Electric Range
58.0 km / 36.0 mi
Fuel Economy
5.6 L/100km / 42.0 MPG (urban)

Powertrain

Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Engine | Bore
74.0 mm / 2.9 in
Engine | Compression Ratio
12.5:1
Engine | Displacement
1.5 L / 90.9 cu-in / 1490.0 cc
Engine | Power
101.0 hp / 75.3 kW @ 5600 rpm + 149.0 hp / 111.1 kW (electric motor)
Engine | Redline
5600 rpm
Engine | Specific Output
67.8 hp/L / 1.1 hp/cu-in
Engine | Stroke
86.6 mm / 3.4 in
Engine | Type
direct-injected petrol inline-4 DOHC engine with 4 values per cylinder
Transmission | Type
Multi-mode electric

Production

Availability
2017 ~ 2018
2016 ~ 2019

Reviews

Neofiliac score
17%
20%
26%
Pros
  • Low official fuel consumption
  • Less ugly than before
  • Slightly improved styling
  • Good fuel economy ratings
  • Longer range than Mk1
Cons
  • Poorly built
  • Only available with small engines
  • No independent rear suspensions
  • No powerful engine options
  • Only available with small engines
  • No independent rear suspensions
  • Miserably low engine output
  • Only available with tiny engines
  • No independent rear suspensions
  • Low cargo capacity

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.