Compare Nissan Juke 2 vs Nissan Murano 2 vs Nissan Juke 2
Variants
1.0 Euro6d
1.0 Euro6d DCT
1.0
1.0 DCT
2.5 dCi AT
2.5 dCi AWD AT
3.5 256 AT
3.5 256 AWD CVT
1.0 Euro6d
1.0 Euro6d DCT
1.0
1.0 DCT
Capacity
Coolant Capacity
6.5 L / 6.9 qt
6.5 L / 6.9 qt
Engine Oil Capacity
4.1 L / 4.3 qt
4.1 L / 4.3 qt
Fuel Capacity
46.0 L / 12.2 gal
82.0 L / 21.7 gal
46.0 L / 12.2 gal
Passengers
5
5
5
Chassis
Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Offroad | Breakover Angle
17.0 deg
Offroad | Departure Angle
27.0 deg
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Semi-independent, coil spring
Multi-link
Semi-independent, coil spring
Turning Circle
10.6 m / 34.7 ft
10.6 m / 34.7 ft
Construction
Body Style
5-door Crossover
5-door SUV
5-door Crossover
Dimensions
Size | Height
1595 mm / 62.8 in
1720 mm / 67.7 in
1595 mm / 62.8 in
Size | Length
4210 mm / 165.7 in
4860 mm / 191.3 in
4210 mm / 165.7 in
Size | Width
1885 mm / 74.2 in
Track Width | Front
1610.0 mm / 63.4 in
Track Width | Rear
1610.0 mm / 63.4 in
Wheelbase
2636 mm / 103.8 in
2825 mm / 111.2 in
2636 mm / 103.8 in
Performance
Top Speed
180.0 km/h / 111.8 mph
180.0 km/h / 111.8 mph
Towing Capacity
750 kg / 1653 lbs (w/o brakes) | 1585 kg / 3494 lbs (w/ brakes @ 12% gradient)
Powertrain
Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Emission Standard
Euro 5
Engine
HR10DDT
VQ35DE
HR10DDT
Engine | Bore
72.2 mm / 2.8 in
72.2 mm / 2.8 in
Engine | Compression Ratio
10.5:1
10.5:1
Engine | Displacement
1.0 L / 61.0 cu-in / 999.0 cc
1.0 L / 61.0 cu-in / 999.0 cc
Engine | Stroke
81.3 mm / 3.2 in
81.3 mm / 3.2 in
Transmission | Gears
6-speed
Reviews
Neofiliac score
2%
28%
2%
Pros
- Cheap to buy
- Marginal offroad capabilities
- Decent engine reliability
- Cheap to buy
Cons
- Extremely ugly
- Horrible 0-100kph time
- Miserably low engine output
- No independent rear suspensions
- Poor build quality
- Worse than Qashqai
- Horrible styling
- Lethargic to drive
- Extremely ugly
- Horrible 0-100kph time
- Miserably low engine output
- No independent rear suspensions
- Poor build quality
- Worse than Qashqai
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.