Compare Chevrolet Blazer vs Chevrolet Equinox 2 vs Chevrolet Equinox 3
Variants
2.0T
2.5
3.6
3.6 AWD
2.4 Euro6
2.4 Euro6 AWD
2.4
2.4 AWD
3.0
3.0 AWD
3.6
3.6 AWD
3.6 Euro6
3.6 Euro6 AWD
1.5
1.5 AWD
1.5
1.6d
1.6d AWD
2.0
2.0 AWD
Capacity
Passengers
5
5
Payload
944 kg / 2081 lbs
Chassis
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Multi-link
Multi-link
Multi-link
Turning Circle
11.8 m / 38.7 ft
12.2 m / 40.0 ft
11.4 m / 37.4 ft
Construction
Body Style
5-door Crossover
5-door SUV
5-door SUV
Dimensions
Ground Clearance
188 mm / 7.4 in
Size | Length
4770 mm / 187.8 in
Track Width | Front
1598.0 mm / 62.9 in
Track Width | Rear
1577.0 mm / 62.1 in
Wheelbase
2863 mm / 112.7 in
2725 mm / 107.3 in
Performance
Top Speed
210.0 km/h / 130.5 mph
Towing Capacity
680 kg / 1499 lbs (w/ brakes @ 12% gradient)
Powertrain
Emission Standard
China VI B
Engine | Displacement
2.0 L / 121.9 cu-in / 1998.0 cc
Transmission | Gears
9-speed
6-speed
Transmission | Type
Automatic
Automatic Hydra-Matic
Automatic Hydra-Matic
Reviews
Neofiliac score
33%
37%
19%
Pros
- Good exterior styling
- High cargo capacity
- Much improved exterior styling
- Decent drivetrain reliability
- Cheap to purchase
Cons
- Poor performance
- Mediocre build quality
- Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
- Falsely marketed as SUV
- Ugly
- Only available with small engines
- Poor suspension setup
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.