Compare Volvo C40 Recharge vs Kia e-Niro vs Mazda MX-30 (DR)

Volvo C40 Recharge

Kia e-Niro

Mazda MX-30 (DR)

Volvo C40 RechargeKia e-NiroMazda MX-30 (DR)
Variants
42 kWh
67 kWh

Reviews

Neofiliac score20%28%4%
Pros
  • Decent performance
  • Up to 420km electric range
  • Good 0.28 drag coefficient
  • Smart styling
  • Pay less tax
Cons
  • No powerful engine options
  • Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
  • Can't even reach 200km/h
  • No powerful engine options
  • Miserably low engine output
  • Horrible hunchback crossover styling
  • Crossover nonsense
  • BEV nonsense
  • Rudimentary suspension setup

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)
RemoveRemoveRemove
Add up to 3 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on a best effort basis. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac respects your privacy. We do not track your activity on this website.