Compare Audi A8 D5 facelift vs Audi A6 C8 vs Audi A7 C8

Variants
50 TDI
55 TFSI
60 TFSI e
60 TFSI
35 TDI
40 TDI
40 TDI quattro
45 TDI quattro
45 TFSI
45 TFSI quattro
45 TFSI ultra
45 TFSI ultra quattro
50 TDI quattro
50 TFSI e quattro
55 TFSI e quattro
55 TFSI quattro
40 TDI
40 TDI quattro
45 TDI quattro
45 TFSI
45 TFSI quattro
45 TFSI ultra
45 TFSI ultra quattro
50 TDI quattro
50 TFSI e quattro
55 TFSI e quattro
55 TFSI e quattro
55 TFSI quattro

Capacity

Passengers
5
5
5

Chassis

Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Offroad | Approach Angle
11.0 deg
13.1 deg
Offroad | Departure Angle
15.0 deg
12.3 deg
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
Multi-link
Multi-link
Multi-link
Suspension | Rear
Multi-link
Multi-link
Multi-link

Construction

Battery | Capacity
17.9 kWh (gross) | 14.4 kWh (net)
14.1 kWh (gross)
Battery | Type
Lithium-ion
Lithium-ion
Battery | Voltage
381.0 V

Dimensions

Size | Height
1457 mm / 57.4 in
Size | Length
4939 mm / 194.4 in
Size | Width
1945 mm / 76.6 in | 2130 mm / 83.9 in (mirror unfolded)
1886 mm / 74.3 in | 2110 mm / 83.1 in (mirror unfolded)
1908 mm / 75.1 in | 2118 mm / 83.4 in (mirror unfolded)
Track Width | Front
1630.0 mm / 64.2 in
1651.0 mm / 65.0 in
Track Width | Rear
1617.0 mm / 63.7 in
1637.0 mm / 64.4 in
Wheelbase
2924 mm / 115.1 in
2926 mm / 115.2 in

Performance

Electric Range
54.0 km / 33.6 mi
Towing Capacity
750 kg / 1653 lbs (w/o brakes) | 2300 kg / 5071 lbs (w/ brakes @ 8% gradient) | 2300 kg / 5071 lbs (w/ brakes @ 12% gradient)

Powertrain

Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (longitudinal), All-wheel drive
Emission Standard
Euro 6d-ISC-FCM
Transmission | Gears
8-speed
7-speed / 8-speed
Transmission | Type
Automatic tiptronic
DCT / automatic

Production

Debut
2018 Geneva Motor Show
2018 North American Autho Show / 2019 Frankfurt Motor Show
Made In
Germany, China, India
Germany

Reviews

Neofiliac score
81%
66%
67%
Pros
  • Decent performance
  • Sleek styling (in SWB)
  • Good 0.26 drag coefficient
  • Low official fuel consumption
  • Good exterior styling
  • Good 0.26 drag coefficient
  • Low official fuel consumption
  • Good suspension setup
  • Good performance
  • Good 0.27 drag coefficient
  • Low official fuel consumption
Cons
  • Too many gizmos
  • Engine keeps getting smaller
  • Too many electronic gizmos
  • Reliability concerns
  • Uglier than the A6
  • Impractical
  • Sold with small engines
  • Too many electronic gizmos

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.