Compare Toyota Camry 8 (XV70)
Toyota Camry 8 (XV70) | |
---|---|
Variants | 2.0 2.5 6AT 2.5 8AT 2.5 Hybrid 3.5 |
Reviews | |
Neofiliac score | 44% |
Pros |
|
Cons |
|
Price | |
Offers (incl. referral links) | |
Remove |
[[{"Ft":"Capacity","Fn":"Cargo Capacity","Fv":"493 L / 17.4 cu-ft"},{"Ft":"Capacity","Fn":"Coolant Capacity","Fv":"6.6 L / 7.0 qt"},{"Ft":"Capacity","Fn":"Engine Oil Capacity","Fv":"4.4 L / 4.6 qt"},{"Ft":"Capacity","Fn":"Fuel Capacity","Fv":"60.0 L / 15.9 gal"},{"Ft":"Capacity","Fn":"Passengers","Fv":"5"},{"Ft":"Capacity","Fn":"Payload","Fv":"450 kg / 992 lbs"},{"Ft":"Chassis","Fn":"Brakes | Front","Fv":"Ventilated discs"},{"Ft":"Chassis","Fn":"Brakes | Rear","Fv":"Disc"},{"Ft":"Chassis","Fn":"Power Steering","Fv":"Electric Steering"},{"Ft":"Chassis","Fn":"Suspension | Front","Fv":"MacPherson strut"},{"Ft":"Chassis","Fn":"Suspension | Rear","Fv":"Multi-link"},{"Ft":"Chassis","Fn":"Tire Size","Fv":"205/65 R16"},{"Ft":"Chassis","Fn":"Turning Circle","Fv":"11.4 m / 37.4 ft"},{"Ft":"Construction","Fn":"Body Style","Fv":"4-door Sedan"},{"Ft":"Dimensions","Fn":"Ground Clearance","Fv":"127 mm / 5.0 in"},{"Ft":"Dimensions","Fn":"Size | Height","Fv":"1455 mm / 57.3 in"},{"Ft":"Dimensions","Fn":"Size | Length","Fv":"4885 mm / 192.3 in"},{"Ft":"Dimensions","Fn":"Size | Width","Fv":"1840 mm / 72.4 in"},{"Ft":"Dimensions","Fn":"Track Width | Front","Fv":"1580.0 mm / 62.2 in"},{"Ft":"Dimensions","Fn":"Track Width | Rear","Fv":"1590.0 mm / 62.6 in"},{"Ft":"Dimensions","Fn":"Weight","Fv":"1570.0 kg / 3461.3 lbs"},{"Ft":"Dimensions","Fn":"Wheel Size","Fv":"16 in"},{"Ft":"Dimensions","Fn":"Wheelbase","Fv":"2825 mm / 111.2 in"},{"Ft":"Performance","Fn":"Acceleration | 0 - 100 km/h","Fv":"11.0 sec"},{"Ft":"Performance","Fn":"Acceleration | 0 - 60 mph","Fv":"10.5 sec"},{"Ft":"Performance","Fn":"CO2 Emission","Fv":"98 ~ 101 g/km"},{"Ft":"Performance","Fn":"Fuel Economy","Fv":"4.5 L/100km / 52.3 MPG (combined) | 4.6 L/100km / 51.1 MPG (urban) | 4.4 L/100km / 53.5 MPG (highway)"},{"Ft":"Performance","Fn":"Top Speed","Fv":"210.0 km/h / 130.5 mph"},{"Ft":"Powertrain","Fn":"Drivetrain Layout","Fv":"Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive"},{"Ft":"Powertrain","Fn":"Engine","Fv":"6AR-FSE"},{"Ft":"Powertrain","Fn":"Engine | Bore","Fv":"86.0 mm / 3.4 in"},{"Ft":"Powertrain","Fn":"Engine | Compression Ratio","Fv":"12.7:1"},{"Ft":"Powertrain","Fn":"Engine | Displacement","Fv":"2.0 L / 121.9 cu-in / 1998.0 cc"},{"Ft":"Powertrain","Fn":"Engine | Power","Fv":"150.0 hp / 111.9 kW @ 6500 rpm"},{"Ft":"Powertrain","Fn":"Engine | Specific Output","Fv":"75.1 hp/L / 1.2 hp/cu-in"},{"Ft":"Powertrain","Fn":"Engine | Stroke","Fv":"86.0 mm / 3.4 in"},{"Ft":"Powertrain","Fn":"Engine | Torque","Fv":"192 Nm / 141.6 lb-ft @ 4700 rpm"},{"Ft":"Powertrain","Fn":"Engine | Type","Fv":"Naturally-aspirated petrol inline-4 DOHC engine with 4 values per cylinder"},{"Ft":"Powertrain","Fn":"Transmission | Gears","Fv":"6-speed"},{"Ft":"Powertrain","Fn":"Transmission | Type","Fv":"Automatic"},{"Ft":"Production","Fn":"Availability","Fv":"2018"}]]
Related Products
- Much better 8- and 9-speed automatic transmissions
- Good 0.28 drag coefficient
- Some styling improvements
· 35%
Chrysler 200 II 2015
- Much improved styling
- Good 0.27 drag coefficient
- 9-speed automatic transmission
· 29%
Add up to 3 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on a best effort basis. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac respects your privacy. We do not track your activity on this website.