Compare Nissan Maxima 8 facelift vs Nissan Altima L32 vs Nissan Sentra B15
Variants
2.5
2.5 CVT
3.5
1.8
2.5
Capacity
Cargo Capacity
405 L / 14.3 cu-ft
433 L / 15.3 cu-ft
329 L / 11.6 cu-ft
Fuel Capacity
68.0 L / 18.0 gal
76.0 L / 20.1 gal
50.0 L / 13.2 gal
Passengers
5
5
5
Chassis
Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Ventilated discs
Disc
Disc
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Hydraulic Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Multi-link
Multi-link
Helical spring
Tire Size
245/45 R18, 245/40 R19
215/55 R17
Construction
Body Style
4-door Sedan
4-door Sedan
4-door Sedan
Dimensions
Size | Height
1435 mm / 56.5 in
1471 mm / 57.9 in
1410 mm / 55.5 in
Size | Length
4897 mm / 192.8 in
4821 mm / 189.8 in
4509 mm / 177.5 in
Size | Width
1859 mm / 73.2 in
1796 mm / 70.7 in
1710 mm / 67.3 in
Track Width | Front
1585.0 mm / 62.4 in
1549.0 mm / 61.0 in
Track Width | Rear
1585.0 mm / 62.4 in
1549.0 mm / 61.0 in
Weight
1611.0 kg / 3551.6 lbs
Wheel Size
8.0J x 18, 8.0J x 19, 8.5J x 19
17 in
Wheelbase
2776 mm / 109.3 in
2776 mm / 109.3 in
2535 mm / 99.8 in
Performance
Acceleration | 0 - 100 km/h
7.2 sec
Acceleration | 0 - 60 mph
6.8 sec
Fuel Economy
9.8 L/100km / 24.0 MPG (combined) | 11.8 L/100km / 19.9 MPG (urban) | 7.8 L/100km / 30.2 MPG (highway)
Top Speed
235.0 km/h / 146.0 mph
Powertrain
Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Engine | Compression Ratio
9.5:1
Engine | Displacement
3.5 L / 213.5 cu-in / 3498.0 cc
Engine | Power
300.0 hp / 223.7 kW @ 6400 rpm
Engine | Specific Output
85.8 hp/L / 1.4 hp/cu-in
Engine | Torque
354 Nm / 261.1 lb-ft @ 4400 rpm
Engine | Type
Naturally-aspirated multi-port injected petrol V6 engine with 4 values per cylinder
Naturally-aspirated multi-port injected petrol inline-4 engine with 4 values per cylinder
Transmission | Gears
6-speed
Transmission | Type
CVT
Manual
Production
Availability
2019
2007 ~ 2012
2000 ~ 2006
Reviews
Neofiliac score
23%
9%
14%
Pros
- Good interior quality
- Caters to those who love electronics
- Naturally-aspirated V6
- Very lightweight
- Good reliability record
Cons
- Ugly
- CVT
- Basic suspension setup
- Unreliable CVT
- Questionable styling
- No powerful engine options
- Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
- Low cargo capacity
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.