Compare Ford Fusion 2 facelift 2 vs Ford Mondeo 4 Liftback facelift vs Ford Focus 3 Sedan facelift

Variants
1.5 EcoBoost SelectShift
Energi
2.0 EcoBoost AWD SelectShift
2.5 Duratec SelectShift
2.7 EcoBoost AWD SelectShift
1.5 EcoBoost 165
1.5 EcoBoost 165 AT
2.0 EcoBlue 120 AT
2.0 EcoBlue 150
2.0 EcoBlue 150 AT
2.0 EcoBlue 190 AT
2.0 EcoBlue 190 AWD AT
1.0T 100hp
1.0T 100hp stop/start
1.0T 125hp
1.0T 125hp stop/start
1.5D 120hp
1.5D 95hp
1.5T 150hp
1.5T 150hp stop/start
1.5T 182hp
1.5T 182hp stop/start
1.6D 115hp
1.6D 115hp stop/start
1.6D 95hp
1.6D 95hp stop/start
1.6T 105hp
1.6T 125hp
1.6T 125hp AT
1.6T 85hp
2.0D 150hp AT
2.0D 150hp AT stop/start
2.0D 150hp stop/start

Capacity

Cargo Capacity
372 L / 13.1 cu-ft
Coolant Capacity
10.5 L / 11.1 qt
Fuel Capacity
60.0 L / 15.9 gal
Passengers
5
5
5

Chassis

Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Disc
Disc
Brakes | Rear
Disc
Disc
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Multi-link
Multi-link
Multi-link
Tire Size
215/60 R16, 235/50 R17, 235/45 R18
205/55 R16, 215/50 R17
Turning Circle
12.4 m / 40.7 ft
11.0 m / 36.1 ft

Construction

Body Style
5-door Hatchback
4-door Sedan

Dimensions

Size | Height
1482 mm / 58.3 in
1484 mm / 58.4 in
Size | Length
4872 mm / 191.8 in
4871 mm / 191.8 in
4534 mm / 178.5 in
Size | Width
1852 mm / 72.9 in | 2121 mm / 83.5 in (mirror unfolded) | 1910 mm / 75.2 in (mirror folded)
2121 mm / 83.5 in (mirror unfolded) | 1911 mm / 75.2 in (mirror folded)
1823 mm / 71.8 in
Track Width | Front
1544.0 mm / 60.8 in
Track Width | Rear
1559.0 mm / 61.4 in
Wheel Size
6.5J x 16, 7.5J x 17, 8J x 18
6.5J x 16, 7.0J x 17
Wheelbase
2850 mm / 112.2 in
2648 mm / 104.3 in

Powertrain

Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Emission Standard
Euro 6d-Temp
Transmission | Gears
6-speed

Production

Availability
2018 ~ 2020
2019 ~ 2022

Reviews

Neofiliac score
29%
31%
22%
Pros
  • Decent reliability
  • Decent comfort
  • Decent drivetrain
  • Down to very low 3.8L/100km fuel consumption (if we believe it)
Cons
  • Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
  • Bland styling
  • Half-hearted design and build quality
  • Poor performance
  • Uglier and less practical than the standard sedan
  • Bad 0-100kph time
  • No powerful engine options
  • Only available with small engines
  • Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.