Compare Renault Talisman facelift vs Mazda 3 BL Sedan facelift vs Renault Laguna III

Variants
1.3 TCe 4CONTROL EDC
1.3 TCe EDC
1.7 Blue dCi
1.7 Blue dCi 4CONTROL
2.0 Blue dCi 160 4CONTROL EDC
2.0 Blue dCi 160 EDC
2.0 Blue dCi 200 4CONTROL EDC
2.0 Blue dCi 200 EDC
1.6D
1.6
1.6 AT
2.0
2.0 AT
2.5
2.5 AT
1.5 dCi
1.5 dCi Euro5
1.5 dCi Euro5 AT
1.6
2.0
2.0 dCi 130
2.0 dCi 131
2.0 dCi 150 AT
2.0 dCi 150 Euro5
2.0 dCi 173
2.0 dCi 173 AT
2.0 dCi 175 Euro5
2.0 Euro5
2.0 Turbo AT
GT 2.0 dCi 150
GT 2.0 dCi 173
GT 2.0 dCi 173 AT

Capacity

Cargo Capacity
608 L / 21.5 cu-ft
Coolant Capacity
7.5 L / 7.9 qt
Engine Oil Capacity
5.0 L / 5.3 qt
Fuel Capacity
66.0 L / 17.4 gal
Passengers
5
5
5

Chassis

Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Disc, 290x11 mm
Disc
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Hydraulic Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Semi-independent, Torsion beam
Multi-link
Semi-independent, Torsion beam
Tire Size
225/55 R17 97W, 245/45 R18 100W, 245/40 R19 98Y
Turning Circle
10.4 m / 34.1 ft

Construction

Body Style
4-door Sedan
4-door Sedan
5-door Sedan

Dimensions

Size | Height
1463 mm / 57.6 in
1470 mm / 57.9 in
1445 mm / 56.9 in
Size | Length
4848 mm / 190.9 in
Size | Width
1869 mm / 73.6 in (mirror unfolded)
1811 mm / 71.3 in
Track Width | Front
1614.0 mm / 63.5 in
1557.0 mm / 61.3 in
Track Width | Rear
1609.0 mm / 63.3 in
1512.0 mm / 59.5 in
Wheel Size
17 in, 18 in, 19 in
Wheelbase
2808 mm / 110.6 in
2640 mm / 103.9 in
2756 mm / 108.5 in

Performance

Coefficient Of Drag
0.27

Powertrain

Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Emission Standard
Euro 6D Temp
Engine
L5-VE
Engine | Redline
6200 rpm
Transmission | Gears
6-speed

Production

Availability
2020
2011 ~ 2013

Reviews

Neofiliac score
6%
42%
19%
Pros
  • Fuel efficient
  • Good 0.27 drag coefficient
  • Small turning circle
  • Good towing capacity
  • Small turning circle
  • Elegant styling
Cons
  • Poor performance
  • Poor build quality
  • Bland styling
  • Poor suspension setup
  • Only available with small engines
  • Horrible 0-100kph time
  • No powerful engine options
  • Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
  • Hatchback version fits the car better
  • Bad 0-100kph time
  • No powerful engine options
  • Only available with small engines
  • No independent rear suspensions

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.