Compare Volvo S90 facelift vs Jaguar XF X260 vs Alfa Romeo 166 (936) facelift

Volvo S90 facelift

Jaguar XF X260

Alfa Romeo 166 (936) facelift

Volvo S90 faceliftJaguar XF X260Alfa Romeo 166 (936) facelift
Variants
B4
B5
B6
D3 MT
D3
D4
D5
T8
20d
20d AWD
20d Euro6d
20d Euro6d AWD
20d Euro6d MT
20d MHEV
20d MHEV AWD
20d MT
20t
25d
25d AWD
25d Euro6d AWD
25t
25t AWD
25t Euro6d
25t Euro6d AWD
25t Euro6d TEMP
30d
30d AWD
30t AWD
30t AWD
30t Euro6d AWD
35t
35t AWD
E-Performance
E-Performance Euro6d
E-Performance Euro6d MT
E-Performance MT
XF S
XF S AWD
2.0 TS
2.4 JTD 10V
2.4 JTD 20V
2.4 JTD 20V AT
2.5 V6
3.0 V6 AT
3.2 V6

Reviews

Neofiliac score64%71%43%
Pros
  • Overall good styling
  • Good 0.26 drag coefficient
  • Low fuel consumption
  • Good towing capacity
  • Good supercharged V6
  • Good 0.25 drag coefficient
  • Good interior quality
  • Double-wishbone + multi-link suspension setup
  • Improved exterior design
  • Improved engine lineup
Cons
  • Electronically limited to just 180 km/h
  • Only available with small engines
  • Unreliable
  • Poor reliability
  • Bland styling
  • Less well appointed than many competitors

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)
RemoveRemoveRemove
Add up to 3 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on a best effort basis. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac respects your privacy. We do not track your activity on this website.