Compare Volvo S90 facelift vs Kia Optima 3 facelift vs Kia Cadenza
Variants
B4
B5
B6
D3 MT
D3
D4
D5
T8
1.7 CRDi
1.7 CRDi AT
2.0 CVVT
2.0 CVVT AT
2.0 CVVT EcoDynamics
2.0 Hybrid
2.0 T-GDI AT
2.4 GDI AT
2.4 MPI
2.7 MPI 166hp
2.7 MPI 200hp
3.3 GDI 297hp
3.5 MPI 290hp
Capacity
Cargo Capacity
461 L / 16.3 cu-ft
451 L / 15.9 cu-ft
Coolant Capacity
6.8 L / 7.2 qt
Engine Oil Capacity
5.6 L / 5.9 qt
4.6 L / 4.9 qt
Passengers
5
5
5
Payload
490 kg / 1080 lbs
Chassis
Brakes | Front
Disc, 322 mm
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Disc, 320 mm
Disc
Disc
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
Double-wishbone
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Multi-link
Multi-link
Multi-link
Tire Size
215/65 R16
Turning Circle
11.8 m / 38.7 ft
11.1 m / 36.3 ft
Water Fording
250 mm / 9.8 in
Construction
Battery | Capacity
11.6 kWh (gross)
Body Style
4-door Sedan
Dimensions
Ground Clearance
156 mm / 6.1 in
145 mm / 5.7 in
Size | Height
1446 mm / 56.9 in
1455 mm / 57.3 in
1475 mm / 58.1 in
Size | Length
4969 mm / 195.6 in
4845 mm / 190.7 in
4965 mm / 195.5 in
Size | Width
1879 mm / 74.0 in | 2019 mm / 79.5 in (mirror unfolded) | 1895 mm / 74.6 in (mirror folded)
1830 mm / 72.0 in
1850 mm / 72.8 in
Track Width | Front
1617.0 mm / 63.7 in
1613.0 mm / 63.5 in
Track Width | Rear
1618.0 mm / 63.7 in
1611.0 mm / 63.4 in
Wheel Size
17 in, 18 in, 19 in, 20 in, 21 in
Wheelbase
2941 mm / 115.8 in
2795 mm / 110.0 in
2845 mm / 112.0 in
Performance
Acceleration | 0 - 100 km/h
7.2 sec
Acceleration | 0 - 60 mph
6.8 sec
Braking | 100 km/h - 0
35.0 m / 114.8 ft
Coefficient Of Drag
0.26 ~ 0.29
0.29
Electric Range
51.0 km / 31.7 mi
Fuel Economy
9.4 L/100km / 25.0 MPG (combined)
Top Speed
180.0 km/h / 111.8 mph
230.0 km/h / 142.9 mph
Towing Capacity
650 kg / 1433 lbs (w/o brakes) | 1300 kg / 2866 lbs (w/ brakes @ 12% gradient)
Powertrain
Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Front-engine (longitudinal), Front-wheel drive
Emission Standard
Euro 5
Euro 2
Engine | Bore
82.0 mm / 3.2 in
Engine | Compression Ratio
10.6:1
Engine | Displacement
2.0 L / 120.2 cu-in / 1969.0 cc
Engine | Stroke
93.2 mm / 3.7 in
Transmission | Gears
6-speed
6-speed
Transmission | Type
Automatic
Production
Availability
2020
2010 ~ 2015
Reviews
Neofiliac score
64%
44%
38%
Pros
- Overall good styling
- Good 0.26 drag coefficient
- Low fuel consumption
- Good towing capacity
- Good 0.28 drag coefficient
- Good towing capacity
- Reasonable exterior styling
- Strong exterior styling
- Good 0.28 drag coefficient
- Robust powertrain lineup
Cons
- Electronically limited to just 180 km/h
- Only available with small engines
- Unreliable
- Horrible 0-100kph time
- Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
- Basic suspension setup with MacPherson front
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.