Compare Volvo S90 facelift vs Volvo S40 II facelift vs Volvo S60

Volvo S90 facelift

Volvo S40 II facelift

Volvo S60

Volvo S90 faceliftVolvo S40 II faceliftVolvo S60
Variants
B4
B5
B6
D3 MT
D3
D4
D5
T8
1.6 100hp
1.6 101hp
1.6 D2
1.6 DRIVe
2.0 D3
2.0 D3 AT
2.0 D4
2.0 D4 AT
2.0 Euro4
2.0 Euro5
2.0 FLEXIFUEL
2.5T 230hp
2.5T AT
2.5T AWD
2.0T
2.0T AT
2.3 T5
2.3 T5 AT
2.4 140hp
2.4 140hp AT
2.4 170hp
2.4 170hp AT
2.4 D5 163hp
2.4 D5 185hp
2.4 T5 260hp
2.4 T5 260hp AT
2.4D
2.4D AT
2.4T 200hp
2.4T 200hp AT
2.4T 200hp AWD
2.5T 210hp
2.5T 210hp AWD
R AWD
R AWD AT

Reviews

Neofiliac score64%36%33%
Pros
  • Overall good styling
  • Good 0.26 drag coefficient
  • Low fuel consumption
  • Good towing capacity
  • Down to very low 3.8L/100km fuel consumption
  • Quite reliable
  • Available with the famous Volvo T5
  • Interesting set of I5 engines
  • Good reliability
Cons
  • Electronically limited to just 180 km/h
  • Only available with small engines
  • Unreliable
  • No powerful engine options
  • Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
  • Uninspiring drive
  • Sterile design inside and outside

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)
RemoveRemoveRemove
Add up to 3 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on a best effort basis. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac respects your privacy. We do not track your activity on this website.